Posted on

Why Your Business Needs a Vertical AI Agent: Top Benefits for Niche Markets

4 min read

Why Your Business Needs a Vertical AI AgentThe rise of artificial intelligence (AI) is continuously transforming how businesses operate, offering opportunities for efficiency, innovation, and growth. However, in an increasingly competitive landscape, businesses seek solutions tailored to their specific industries. To meet this demand for more tailored tools, vertical AI agents are emerging as key to staying ahead in the age of specialization.

What are Vertical AI Agents?

Vertical AI agents are designed to solve specific problems within industries in areas such as finance, retail, and healthcare. This differs from horizontal AI, which provides general capabilities across various sectors. Horizontal AI cross-functional applications such as marketing automation are applicable across different sectors. These horizontal AI solutions were witnessed in the early days of AI, when companies like Google, Microsoft, and Amazon created broad AI solutions. These solutions handle multiple tasks but are not optimized for any specific ones.

Vertical AI has been enabled by advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), which now possess the capability to process complex, industry-specific data and automate complex tasks. These breakthroughs and the inefficiencies of outdated technologies in many industries have created a demand for specialized solutions. Additionally, some platforms simplify the creation and deployment of vertical AI by providing data management and customization tools. At the same time, businesses increasingly recognize AI’s potential to drive efficiency and competitive advantage.

Vertical AI agents are emerging as the next disruption in tech and are anticipated to dominate in 2025. With its market valued at $5.1 billion in 2024, the figures are projected to rise to $47.1 billion by 2030.

Some areas where vertical AI agents are used include finance to enhance risk assessment models and provide insights into market trends and investment opportunities.

Banking institutions are also deploying vertical AI agents to detect fraud in real-time and reduce manual intervention.

In retail verticals, AI agents help personalize product suggestions for customers.

It is important to note that the success of vertical AI precision depends on its ability to solve clear and specific problems. It leverages industry-specific data and domain expertise to deliver solutions that have better precision than general AI systems.

As such, some companies have begun building their own AI tools by using their datasets to create tailored solutions for their specific industry challenges.

Key Benefits of Vertical AI Agents for Niche Markets

  1. Increased operational efficiency – Frees human resources by automating complex and repetitive tasks to increase productivity. Employees have more time to focus on tasks that require creativity, strategy, or problem-solving.
  2. Enhanced accuracy and decision-making – Vertical AI agents are trained on vast amounts of industry-specific data. As a result, they deliver more accurate and consistent results. This reduces human error, which may have dire consequences in critical high-stakes fields such as healthcare and finance.
  3. Cost saving – automating tasks traditionally performed by large teams helps reduce costs. It lowers payroll expenses and minimizes operational costs. This enables companies to reallocate resources to innovation and growth rather than to routine tasks.
  4. Unlock new markets – traditional software solutions may struggle to penetrate niche markets. This is because of their complexity or unstructured data requirements. However, vertical AI agents handle these challenges effectively, opening up new revenue opportunities in previously underserved segments.
  5. Improved customer experience – vertical AI agents enhance customer interaction since they can provide personalized service and faster response time.
  6. Competitive advantage – businesses leveraging vertical AI agents have a significant competitive edge over competitors relying on generalized solutions.
  7. Driving innovation – vertical AI agents streamline operations and offer data-driven recommendations. This enables businesses to experiment and develop cutting-edge products and services. Ultimately, a business can maintain a competitive edge in niche markets.

Challenges and Considerations

Vertical AI agents have compelling benefits but also come with some challenges. A business must navigate the potential challenges during implementation. This includes integration with existing systems, data privacy concerns, employee resistance, and the need for ongoing human oversight. The good news is that with careful planning and a strategic approach, it is easy to overcome these challenges and fully realize the benefits of vertical AI.

Closing Thoughts

Automation has become a critical tool for businesses that want to remain competitive. As the demand for smarter and more efficient operations rises, vertical AI agents are emerging as a solution. These advanced AI solutions deliver targeted results by focusing on niche applications. As AI continues to advance, vertical AI agents will become more efficient and accessible, integrating with broader systems.

Posted on

Beefing Up Laws for Illegal Immigrants and Preparing for Future Disasters

3 min read

S 5,HR 152,HR 153,HR 164,HR 471, HR 187, HCon Res. 1Laken Riley Act (S 5) – A holdover from the last congressional session, this bill was re-introduced by Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) on Jan. 6. It is similar to a 1996 law, the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, that deports illegal immigrants who are found guilty of serious crimes. This new bill enables the government to detain and deport illegals who are arrested for serious crimes or misdemeanors (such as shoplifting), but they do not have to be charged or found guilty. The legislation passed in the Senate on Jan. 20 and the House on Jan. 22, and it is expected to be the first bill signed by the Trump administration.

Federal Disaster Assistance Coordination Act (HR 152) – This legislation would amend the Disaster Recovery Reform Act of 2018 to authorize a new study designed to streamline and consolidate data regarding the collection of preliminary damage assessments. It was introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS) on Jan. 3, passed in the House on Jan. 13, and is currently in the Senate.

Post-Disaster Assistance Online Accountability Act (HR 153) – This is a disaster companion bill, also introduced by Rep. Mike Ezell (R-MS) on Jan. 3. It would create an online repository for recipients of Federal disaster assistance to meet specific reporting requirements. The bipartisan bill passed in the House on Jan. 14, and its fate also lies with the Senate.

POWER Act of 2025 (HR 164) – Also known as the Promoting Opportunities to Widen Electrical Resilience Act, this non-controversial bill was passed on Jan. 15 under a House procedure called “suspension of the rules.” It would allow Federal agencies to provide essential assistance for the emergency restoration of power and not restrict utility company recipients from also qualifying for hazard mitigation assistance if necessary. The bill amends the previous Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (1988), which details the process for federal government assistance to state and local governments following a major disaster. The bill was introduced by Rep. Valerie Hoyle (D-OR) on Jan. 3 and currently lies with the Senate.

Fix Our Forests Act (HR 471) – The purpose of this bill is to expedite improvements in forest management activities on National Forest public lands under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management to return resilience to overgrown, fire-prone forested lands. This bipartisan legislation was introduced by Rep. Bruce Westerman (R-AR) on Jan. 16 and passed in the House on Jan. 23. It currently lies with the Senate.

MAPWaters Act of 2025 (HR 187) – This bipartisan bill authorizes the standardization, consolidation, and publication of federal waterways data regarding outdoor recreational uses by the public, as tracked by federal land and water management agencies. The legislation was introduced by Rep. Blake Moore (R-UT) on Jan. 3, passed in the House on Jan. 21, and is under consideration in the Senate.

Regarding consent to assemble outside the seat of government (HCon Res. 1) – This concurrent resolution was introduced on Jan. 3 by Rep. Michelle Fischbach (R-MN). It is a bipartisan resolution, agreed to by all four majority and minority leaders in both houses, that would allow members of the House and the Senate to assemble at a location outside the District of Columbia if it is in the public interest. The resolution passed in the House on Jan. 3 and currently rests in the Senate.

Posted on

Tips for Tax Season

4 min read

Tips for Tax SeasonWhether you file your income tax return early or at the last minute, there are ways to simplify the process and reduce what you owe – or even increase your refund – before the deadline.

Filing Simplification Tip

Once you receive your W-2 and/or 1099 tax forms, see what income tax bracket you fall under to determine whether you should itemize expenses or take the standard deduction. Thinking about this step first can save you a lot of time. If you don’t come near the standard deduction amount, you will not be itemizing expenses. And if you are not itemizing expenses, you won’t have to gather all the receipts (e.g., mortgage interest, property tax, state and local income taxes, and sales tax paid in 2024).  

2024 Tax Season Income Tax Brackets

 
Single filer Married filing separately Married filing jointly (includes qualifying widow/er) Head of Household Tax Rate

$0 to $11,600 

$0 to $11,600 

$0 to $23,200 

$0 to $16,550 

10%

$11,601 to $47,150 

$11,601 to $47,150 

$23,201 to $94,300 

$16,551 to $63,100 

12%

$47,151 to $100,525 

$47,151 to $100,525 

$94,301 to $201,050 

$63,101 to $100,500 

22%

$100,526 to $191,950 

$100,526 to $191,950 

$201,051 to $383,900 

$100,501 to $191,950 

24%

$191,951 to $243,725 

$191,951 to $243,725 

$383,901 to $487,450 

$191,951 to $243,700 

32%

$243,726 to $609,350 

$243,726 to $365,600 

$487,451 to $731,200 

$243,701 to $609,350 

35%

$609,351 or more 

$365,601 or more 

$731,201 or more 

$609,351 or more

37%

2024 Tax Season Standard Deductions

Single filer and married filing separately Married filing jointly (includes qualifying widow/er) Head of Household

$14,600

$29,200

$21,900

Retirement Saving Tips

It’s not too late to contribute to an IRA. Both the traditional and Roth IRAs allow you to make contributions for 2024 up until the tax-filing deadline of the following year – which this year is Tuesday, April 15. The advantage to this later deadline is that you can complete your taxes before they are due, then adjust them to reduce your tax liability if needed by contributing to your IRA. The total maximum contribution you can make to all of your IRAs combined (both Roths and traditional) is $7,000 for 2024 or $8,000 if you are 50 years or older.

However, if you have a Roth IRA, there are restrictions to contributions based on your 2024 income. You may make the maximum contribution to your Roth only if your 2024 modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is less than a certain threshold.

Filing Status MAGI Contribution amount

Single and Head of Household filers

Below $146,000

Between $146,001 and 161,000

Above $161,000

$7,000/$8,000 (age 50+)

Phased (IRS Worksheet 2-2)

Nothing

Married filing jointly

(includes qualifying widow/er)

Below $230,000

Between $230,000 and $240,000

Above $240,000

$7,000/$8,000 (age 50+)

Phased (IRS Worksheet 2-2)

Nothing

Be aware that the amount of deduction you can claim for a traditional IRA contribution may be limited if you or your spouse are covered by a retirement plan at work.

Filing Status MAGI Deduction amount

Single and Head of Household filers

$77,000 or less

Between $77,000 and 87,000

$87,000 or more

Full deduction

Partial (IRS Worksheet 1-2)

None

Married filing jointly

(includes qualifying widow/er)

$123,000 or less

Between $123,000 and 143,000

$143,000 or more

Full deduction

Partial (IRS Worksheet 1-2)

None

Married filing separately

Less than $10,000

$10,000 or more

Partial (IRS Worksheet 1-2)

None

If you make a traditional and/or Roth IRA contribution by the April 15 deadline, you may qualify for the Retirement Saver’s Credit (also available if you contributed to an employer plan by Dec. 31, 2024). The maximum credit is $1,000 ($2,000 for married couples), and it can increase your refund or reduce the tax you owe. However, the saver’s credit is subject to other deductions, credits, and income restrictions.

Filing Status MAGI

Single and Married filing separately

up to $57,375

Married couples filing jointly

(includes qualifying widow/er)

up to $76,500

 

Head of Household Filers

up to $57,375

Work with an experienced tax preparer to take advantage of legitimate deductions and credits to ensure that you only pay what is required for your situation.

Posted on

The Social Security Fairness Act of 2023: More Retirement Income for Teachers, Police, Firefighters & Gov. Workers

3 min read

The Social Security Fairness Act of 2023, More Retirement Income for Teachers Police Firefighters & Gov WorkersThe Social Security Fairness Act of 2023, formally known as H.R. 82, aimed at ending two provisions in the Social Security system that affect public sector employees who have earned pensions from jobs not covered by Social Security. These provisions are the Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset, both of which reduce or eliminate Social Security benefits for workers who have worked in both public-sector and private-sector jobs.

The Problem: WEP and GPO

The Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset were originally designed to prevent public sector workers from receiving larger Social Security benefits than they would have been entitled to had they worked in jobs covered by Social Security for their entire careers. However, critics argue that these provisions disproportionately harm workers who have spent a significant portion of their careers in public service, such as teachers, police officers, firefighters, and other state and local government employees.

Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP):

The WEP reduces the Social Security benefits of individuals who have worked in both the private sector (where they paid into Social Security) and the public sector (where they often did not contribute to Social Security). Typically, Social Security benefits are based on an individual’s 35 highest-earning years. The WEP alters the formula used to calculate benefits for individuals with fewer than 30 years of substantial earnings in Social Security-covered employment, leading to a lower Social Security benefit than they would otherwise be entitled to. For many, this results in a significant reduction in the monthly payment they would have received under the standard Social Security formula.

Government Pension Offset (GPO):

The GPO affects spouses and widows/widowers of Social Security beneficiaries. Under this provision, individuals who receive a government pension from work that was not covered by Social Security (such as state or local government employees) see a reduction in their spousal or survivor benefits from Social Security. The offset is calculated by reducing the spousal or survivor benefit by an amount equal to two-thirds of the government pension. This can leave many public employees with little to no spousal or survivor benefits despite their spouse having paid into Social Security.

What H.R. 82 Seeks to Accomplish

By eliminating both the WEP and GPO, the bill aims to ensure that public sector workers who have earned Social Security benefits through their work in the private sector are not penalized by reductions in those benefits. It also seeks to provide fairer treatment for the spouses and survivors of government employees who may otherwise see their Social Security benefits reduced or eliminated entirely.

The bill has garnered bipartisan support, as lawmakers from both sides of the aisle recognize the fairness of eliminating these provisions, which many see as an unjust penalty against those who have dedicated their careers to public service. H.R. 82, if passed, would provide much-needed relief to millions of retirees, many of who are struggling with the financial impacts of these provisions.

Conclusion:

The introduction of H.R. 82, the Social Security Fairness Act of 2023, marks a crucial point in the ongoing debate over Social Security benefits for public sector workers. By eliminating the Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset, the bill would restore fairness and equity for millions of public employees who have spent their careers in service to their communities. As this bill progresses, it will likely remain a significant issue in discussions surrounding Social Security reform and the treatment of public sector employees.

President Joe Biden signed H.R. 82, the Social Security Fairness Act, into law on Sunday, January 5, 2025, at 3:00 p.m. Central Time Zone.

Posted on

How Reporting Might be Less Complex in 2025

4 min read

How Reporting Might be Less Complex in 2025A Dec. 3 proposal from FASB’s Accounting Standards Update (ASU) might provide some flexibility for private businesses and select nonprofits. “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326)” looks at measuring credit losses for contract assets and accounts receivable for these entities.

When it comes to determining projected credit losses for current accounts receivables and current contract assets, businesses face immense resource needs and reporting requirements, including for assets acquired prior to the publication dates of financial statements.

With public comments being received through Jan. 17, 2025, industry professionals have reported that when it comes to gauging projected credit losses for current contract assets and current accounts receivable, there’s a massive undertaking and validation necessary for assets collected prior to financial statement issuance dates. Industry professionals argue that being able to factor in collections post-balance sheet date in calculating expected credit losses would reduce the complexity for preparers, whereas, for third parties, including investors and others who utilize financial statements, it would provide them with valuable data.

FASB proposed an amendment to ASC 326 207 to allow private companies and certain not-for-profit entities to employ a more flexible and efficient way to better gauge their projected credit losses for current contract assets and accounts receivable that originate from transaction accounts under ASC 606.

Working with the Private Company Council (PCC) to look at stakeholders’ concerns that estimating projected credit losses can be exorbitant and complicated for financial proceedings, FASB is soliciting comments on whether or not to expand the scope of entities included for ASU standards, along with different asset classes.

Current Criteria

According to ASC 326-20, when expected credit losses are estimated by entities, an entity must evaluate their ability to garner cash flows via the lens of contemporary economic circumstances, rational and documented projections, and past losses. Past losses may need to be fine-tuned to approximate project credit losses if past circumstances change from present conditions or from well-ground estimates and documented projections. Another consideration when formulating credit loss projections is that entities aren’t required to factor in collections obtained post-balance sheet date.  

Proposed Additions

When it comes to the proposed additions, FASB speaks to a practical expedient and an accounting policy election. The practical expedient concerns an entity’s well-grounded, data-dependent projections. If an entity chooses the practical expedient, it would be able to factor in collection activity beyond the balance sheet date when projecting expected credit losses.

Practical Expedient

To formulate projections that are rational and based on verified accounting details, this so-called practical expedient can be chosen by the entity that assumes its present balance sheet conditions will last for the entire projection time frame. Choosing a practical expedient also implies that an entity’s accounting policy will factor in collection activity past its balance sheet date when gauging expected credit losses. Specifically, under 326-20-30-10C for the practical expedient, during the projection time frame, an entity will maintain the exact circumstances of the balance sheet throughout the rational and data-based projection period.

If a business, for example, has determined a particular client is facing monetary challenges, it would account for its client’s financial issues through projections of estimated expected credit losses for said client, even though it has not impacted the business’ historical loss experience or if the business is up to date as of the balance sheet date.

Accounting Policy Election

Per 326-20-30-10E, when a practical expedient from 326-20-30-10C through 30-10D is chosen by entities for their accounting policy election when projecting credit losses, it signals that the entity factors in collection activity after the balance sheet date, but prior to the date of financial statement issuance. If an entity uses one or both of the practical expedient and/or accounting policy elections, disclosure is mandatory.

Conclusion

Lastly, such advice would be administered on a forward-looking basis, and both of these entities (PCC and FASB) will make the ultimate findings and guidelines of the implementation dates once industry professionals’ comments are considered. However, entities will likely be able to utilize these guidelines sooner.

For eligible companies, these standards could provide greater flexibility and the ability to divert resources to more productive allocations.