Posted on

Securing Client Data: The Importance of Encrypted Apps

4 min read

Securing Client DataThe Salt Typhoon cyberattack is among recent cyberattacks that reaffirm the urgent need for robust data security measures. This attack targeted major telecommunications providers, compromising critical infrastructure and potentially exposing vast amounts of sensitive data. With cyberthreats becoming more sophisticated, businesses and individuals must prioritize data security to maintain trust and compliance.

The Role of Apps in Managing and Protecting Client Data

Businesses need apps because they make the work easier and more organized. Apps help teams communicate better, manage tasks, and share information quickly, no matter where people are. The apps also simplify handling customer needs, improving service, and tracking business performance. Generally, apps save time while helping businesses work smarter and stay competitive.

One of the most critical uses of apps is managing client data. This data includes personal details like names and addresses. It also includes financial information such as bank details, as well as business-specific data like contracts and project plans. Losing or exposing this sensitive information can lead to severe consequences, including financial losses, legal penalties, and damaged reputations. Clients may lose trust in your business, leading to lost opportunities and reduced customer loyalty. By using apps effectively, businesses can better organize, safeguard, and utilize client data to build stronger relationships and maintain long-term success.

Encryption: A Critical Security Measure

Encryption has become crucial in modern data security. It transforms readable data into an unreadable format, ensuring only authorized parties can access the information. There are various types of encryptions, including end-to-end encryption (E2EE), which protects data during transmission, and at-rest encryption, which secures stored data.

Following the Salt Typhoon cyberattacks, the FBI and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued a joint advisory urging individuals and organizations to prioritize using encrypted communication channels. Given the vulnerability of traditional communication methods, the agencies strongly recommended adopting end-to-end encrypted messaging apps like Signal for secure communication. This recommendation aims to mitigate the risks associated with compromised telecommunication networks. It also helps protect sensitive information from unauthorized access. Even if cybercriminals intercept the data, they cannot decipher it without the encryption key. This layer of protection mitigates the risks of unauthorized access and data breaches, making encryption an essential tool for businesses.

The Role of Encrypted Apps

  1. Enhanced security: Encrypted apps provide a critical layer of defense against sophisticated cyberattacks. By encrypting data both in transit and at rest, these apps ensure that even if communication networks are compromised, sensitive information remains inaccessible to attackers.
  2. Compliance with regulations: With so many ongoing cyberattacks, regulatory scrutiny of data security practices has intensified. Encrypted apps can help businesses comply with relevant regulations, such as the GDPR and CCPA, by demonstrating a commitment to data protection.
  3. Building trust and customer loyalty: Customers are increasingly wary of data breaches in an era of heightened cybersecurity concerns. Utilizing encrypted apps demonstrates a commitment to data security and privacy, fostering trust and loyalty among clients.
  4. Protecting business operations: Encrypted apps are crucial for protecting client data and safeguarding critical business information, such as intellectual property, financial records, and internal communications. This ensures the continuity and integrity of business operations, even in the face of advanced cyber threats.

Choosing and Implementing Encrypted Apps

When selecting and implementing the right encrypted apps, it is important to consider them carefully. First, it is good to consider industry-specific needs as different industries have different data security needs. For example, while a healthcare provider must comply with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulations, a business in the financial industry must adhere to banking regulations. This calls for selecting industry-specific apps.

Businesses also must prioritize apps with robust security features, such as strong encryption algorithms, multifactor authentication, and regular security updates. It is also important to carefully review the data privacy policies of app providers and ensure compliance with relevant regulations.

Effective employee training is also essential for successfully implementing encrypted apps. Employees must be educated on the importance of data security, the proper use of encrypted apps, and best practices for handling sensitive information.

Conclusion

Client data is one of a business’s most valuable assets, and protecting it is paramount. The growing threat of cyberattacks and the increasing complexity of data protection regulations make encryption an essential tool. By embracing encrypted communication channels, businesses can significantly enhance their resilience against sophisticated cyberattacks, protect sensitive client data, and maintain a competitive edge in today’s digital economy.

Posted on

National Security

4 min read

National Security, S 3613, HR 5009, HR 2950, S 4367, HR 9668, HR 9716Improving Federal Building Security Act of 2024 (S 3613) – The Federal Protective Service (FPS) contracts security guards to control access to government facilities and screen visitors to detect prohibited items, such as pepper spray and batons. Earlier this year, FPS investigators conducted a covert test at certain federal buildings in which the guards failed to detect prohibited items about 50 percent of the time. In response, Congress passed this bill requiring Facility Security Committees to respond to security recommendations issued by the FPS. It also mandates that the Homeland Security Department submit an unredacted report to Congress regarding FPS surveillance technology recommendations as well as summarize the FPS recommendations that buildings accepted or rejected. However, no additional funding for security is appropriated by the bill, which will sunset five years following enactment. The act was introduced on Jan. 18, 2024, by Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI). It passed in the Senate on March 23, the House on Dec. 10, and was signed into law on Dec. 17.

Servicemember Quality of Life Improvement and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025 (HR 5009) – This year’s version of the annual funding bill features a 14.5 percent increase in pay for junior enlisted servicemembers, as well as a 4.5 percent pay raise for all other personnel. The legislation also provides cost-of-living allowances per location, improved housing/barracks repair programs, more access to medical and mental health services, and increased employment support for military spouses. The legislation was introduced by Rep. David Joyce (R-OH) on July 27, 2023. This is a bipartisan bill that has passed in both the Senate and the House with various changes. It is currently awaiting signature by the White House for enactment.

Coastal Habitat Conservation Act of 2023 (HR 2950) – Introduced by Rep. Jared Huffman (D-CA) on April 7, 2023, this bill passed the House on Sept. 24, 2024, the Senate on Nov. 21, and was signed into law on Dec. 11. The legislation empowers the Coastal Program of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to increase efforts to assess, protect, restore and enhance key coastal environments that provide fish and wildlife habitats for certain federal trust species.

Thomas R. Carper Water Resources Development Act of 2024 (S 4367) – This legislation was introduced by Sen. Thomas Carper (D-DE) on May 20, 2024. It passed in the Senate on Aug. 1 and in the House (with changes) on Dec. 10; the final bill is expected to be approved and signed into law by the end of the congressional session. This bipartisan bill is designed to improve the nation’s water resources infrastructure, including ports and harbors, inland waterway navigation, and flood and storm protection; it also strengthens our resilience during natural disasters. The legislation also institutes reforms at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in order to streamline processes and deploy projects faster.

SHIELD Against CCP Act (HR 9668) – Introduced on Sept. 18, 2024, by Rep. Dale Strong (R-AL), this bill would establish a task force working with the Department of Homeland Security. The group’s sole focus would be on countering terrorism, cybersecurity, and border/port security related to threats posed by the Chinese Communist Party. The legislation is in response to recent CCP activities such as stealing intellectual property and technology, threats to economic supply chain security and critical infrastructure, and surveillance activities targeting U.S. defense sites and even American citizens. The bipartisan bill passed in the House on Dec. 10 and is currently in the Senate.

Increasing Baseline Updates Act (HR 9716) – In the first quarter of each year, the Congressional Budget Office provides Congress with an annual baseline 10-year projection of the budget and economy based on the fiscal impact of legislative proposals. Updates are released in Q2 and Q3 to reflect newly enacted laws and economic conditions. This bill would mandate that the executive branch provide critical data to the CBO by February 1 of each year to produce a more accurate annual budget baseline. The bill passed in the House on Dec. 11 and currently lies with the Senate. It was introduced by Rep. Blake Moore (R-UT) on Sept. 20, 2024.

Posted on

Tips for Tax Season

4 min read

Tips for Tax SeasonWhether you file your income tax return early or at the last minute, there are ways to simplify the process and reduce what you owe – or even increase your refund – before the deadline.

Filing Simplification Tip

Once you receive your W-2 and/or 1099 tax forms, see what income tax bracket you fall under to determine whether you should itemize expenses or take the standard deduction. Thinking about this step first can save you a lot of time. If you don’t come near the standard deduction amount, you will not be itemizing expenses. And if you are not itemizing expenses, you won’t have to gather all the receipts (e.g., mortgage interest, property tax, state and local income taxes, and sales tax paid in 2024).  

2024 Tax Season Income Tax Brackets

 
Single filer Married filing separately Married filing jointly (includes qualifying widow/er) Head of Household Tax Rate

$0 to $11,600 

$0 to $11,600 

$0 to $23,200 

$0 to $16,550 

10%

$11,601 to $47,150 

$11,601 to $47,150 

$23,201 to $94,300 

$16,551 to $63,100 

12%

$47,151 to $100,525 

$47,151 to $100,525 

$94,301 to $201,050 

$63,101 to $100,500 

22%

$100,526 to $191,950 

$100,526 to $191,950 

$201,051 to $383,900 

$100,501 to $191,950 

24%

$191,951 to $243,725 

$191,951 to $243,725 

$383,901 to $487,450 

$191,951 to $243,700 

32%

$243,726 to $609,350 

$243,726 to $365,600 

$487,451 to $731,200 

$243,701 to $609,350 

35%

$609,351 or more 

$365,601 or more 

$731,201 or more 

$609,351 or more

37%

2024 Tax Season Standard Deductions

Single filer and married filing separately Married filing jointly (includes qualifying widow/er) Head of Household

$14,600

$29,200

$21,900

Retirement Saving Tips

It’s not too late to contribute to an IRA. Both the traditional and Roth IRAs allow you to make contributions for 2024 up until the tax-filing deadline of the following year – which this year is Tuesday, April 15. The advantage to this later deadline is that you can complete your taxes before they are due, then adjust them to reduce your tax liability if needed by contributing to your IRA. The total maximum contribution you can make to all of your IRAs combined (both Roths and traditional) is $7,000 for 2024 or $8,000 if you are 50 years or older.

However, if you have a Roth IRA, there are restrictions to contributions based on your 2024 income. You may make the maximum contribution to your Roth only if your 2024 modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) is less than a certain threshold.

Filing Status MAGI Contribution amount

Single and Head of Household filers

Below $146,000

Between $146,001 and 161,000

Above $161,000

$7,000/$8,000 (age 50+)

Phased (IRS Worksheet 2-2)

Nothing

Married filing jointly

(includes qualifying widow/er)

Below $230,000

Between $230,000 and $240,000

Above $240,000

$7,000/$8,000 (age 50+)

Phased (IRS Worksheet 2-2)

Nothing

Be aware that the amount of deduction you can claim for a traditional IRA contribution may be limited if you or your spouse are covered by a retirement plan at work.

Filing Status MAGI Deduction amount

Single and Head of Household filers

$77,000 or less

Between $77,000 and 87,000

$87,000 or more

Full deduction

Partial (IRS Worksheet 1-2)

None

Married filing jointly

(includes qualifying widow/er)

$123,000 or less

Between $123,000 and 143,000

$143,000 or more

Full deduction

Partial (IRS Worksheet 1-2)

None

Married filing separately

Less than $10,000

$10,000 or more

Partial (IRS Worksheet 1-2)

None

If you make a traditional and/or Roth IRA contribution by the April 15 deadline, you may qualify for the Retirement Saver’s Credit (also available if you contributed to an employer plan by Dec. 31, 2024). The maximum credit is $1,000 ($2,000 for married couples), and it can increase your refund or reduce the tax you owe. However, the saver’s credit is subject to other deductions, credits, and income restrictions.

Filing Status MAGI

Single and Married filing separately

up to $57,375

Married couples filing jointly

(includes qualifying widow/er)

up to $76,500

 

Head of Household Filers

up to $57,375

Work with an experienced tax preparer to take advantage of legitimate deductions and credits to ensure that you only pay what is required for your situation.

Posted on

The Social Security Fairness Act of 2023: More Retirement Income for Teachers, Police, Firefighters & Gov. Workers

3 min read

The Social Security Fairness Act of 2023, More Retirement Income for Teachers Police Firefighters & Gov WorkersThe Social Security Fairness Act of 2023, formally known as H.R. 82, aimed at ending two provisions in the Social Security system that affect public sector employees who have earned pensions from jobs not covered by Social Security. These provisions are the Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset, both of which reduce or eliminate Social Security benefits for workers who have worked in both public-sector and private-sector jobs.

The Problem: WEP and GPO

The Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset were originally designed to prevent public sector workers from receiving larger Social Security benefits than they would have been entitled to had they worked in jobs covered by Social Security for their entire careers. However, critics argue that these provisions disproportionately harm workers who have spent a significant portion of their careers in public service, such as teachers, police officers, firefighters, and other state and local government employees.

Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP):

The WEP reduces the Social Security benefits of individuals who have worked in both the private sector (where they paid into Social Security) and the public sector (where they often did not contribute to Social Security). Typically, Social Security benefits are based on an individual’s 35 highest-earning years. The WEP alters the formula used to calculate benefits for individuals with fewer than 30 years of substantial earnings in Social Security-covered employment, leading to a lower Social Security benefit than they would otherwise be entitled to. For many, this results in a significant reduction in the monthly payment they would have received under the standard Social Security formula.

Government Pension Offset (GPO):

The GPO affects spouses and widows/widowers of Social Security beneficiaries. Under this provision, individuals who receive a government pension from work that was not covered by Social Security (such as state or local government employees) see a reduction in their spousal or survivor benefits from Social Security. The offset is calculated by reducing the spousal or survivor benefit by an amount equal to two-thirds of the government pension. This can leave many public employees with little to no spousal or survivor benefits despite their spouse having paid into Social Security.

What H.R. 82 Seeks to Accomplish

By eliminating both the WEP and GPO, the bill aims to ensure that public sector workers who have earned Social Security benefits through their work in the private sector are not penalized by reductions in those benefits. It also seeks to provide fairer treatment for the spouses and survivors of government employees who may otherwise see their Social Security benefits reduced or eliminated entirely.

The bill has garnered bipartisan support, as lawmakers from both sides of the aisle recognize the fairness of eliminating these provisions, which many see as an unjust penalty against those who have dedicated their careers to public service. H.R. 82, if passed, would provide much-needed relief to millions of retirees, many of who are struggling with the financial impacts of these provisions.

Conclusion:

The introduction of H.R. 82, the Social Security Fairness Act of 2023, marks a crucial point in the ongoing debate over Social Security benefits for public sector workers. By eliminating the Windfall Elimination Provision and the Government Pension Offset, the bill would restore fairness and equity for millions of public employees who have spent their careers in service to their communities. As this bill progresses, it will likely remain a significant issue in discussions surrounding Social Security reform and the treatment of public sector employees.

President Joe Biden signed H.R. 82, the Social Security Fairness Act, into law on Sunday, January 5, 2025, at 3:00 p.m. Central Time Zone.

Posted on

How Reporting Might be Less Complex in 2025

4 min read

How Reporting Might be Less Complex in 2025A Dec. 3 proposal from FASB’s Accounting Standards Update (ASU) might provide some flexibility for private businesses and select nonprofits. “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326)” looks at measuring credit losses for contract assets and accounts receivable for these entities.

When it comes to determining projected credit losses for current accounts receivables and current contract assets, businesses face immense resource needs and reporting requirements, including for assets acquired prior to the publication dates of financial statements.

With public comments being received through Jan. 17, 2025, industry professionals have reported that when it comes to gauging projected credit losses for current contract assets and current accounts receivable, there’s a massive undertaking and validation necessary for assets collected prior to financial statement issuance dates. Industry professionals argue that being able to factor in collections post-balance sheet date in calculating expected credit losses would reduce the complexity for preparers, whereas, for third parties, including investors and others who utilize financial statements, it would provide them with valuable data.

FASB proposed an amendment to ASC 326 207 to allow private companies and certain not-for-profit entities to employ a more flexible and efficient way to better gauge their projected credit losses for current contract assets and accounts receivable that originate from transaction accounts under ASC 606.

Working with the Private Company Council (PCC) to look at stakeholders’ concerns that estimating projected credit losses can be exorbitant and complicated for financial proceedings, FASB is soliciting comments on whether or not to expand the scope of entities included for ASU standards, along with different asset classes.

Current Criteria

According to ASC 326-20, when expected credit losses are estimated by entities, an entity must evaluate their ability to garner cash flows via the lens of contemporary economic circumstances, rational and documented projections, and past losses. Past losses may need to be fine-tuned to approximate project credit losses if past circumstances change from present conditions or from well-ground estimates and documented projections. Another consideration when formulating credit loss projections is that entities aren’t required to factor in collections obtained post-balance sheet date.  

Proposed Additions

When it comes to the proposed additions, FASB speaks to a practical expedient and an accounting policy election. The practical expedient concerns an entity’s well-grounded, data-dependent projections. If an entity chooses the practical expedient, it would be able to factor in collection activity beyond the balance sheet date when projecting expected credit losses.

Practical Expedient

To formulate projections that are rational and based on verified accounting details, this so-called practical expedient can be chosen by the entity that assumes its present balance sheet conditions will last for the entire projection time frame. Choosing a practical expedient also implies that an entity’s accounting policy will factor in collection activity past its balance sheet date when gauging expected credit losses. Specifically, under 326-20-30-10C for the practical expedient, during the projection time frame, an entity will maintain the exact circumstances of the balance sheet throughout the rational and data-based projection period.

If a business, for example, has determined a particular client is facing monetary challenges, it would account for its client’s financial issues through projections of estimated expected credit losses for said client, even though it has not impacted the business’ historical loss experience or if the business is up to date as of the balance sheet date.

Accounting Policy Election

Per 326-20-30-10E, when a practical expedient from 326-20-30-10C through 30-10D is chosen by entities for their accounting policy election when projecting credit losses, it signals that the entity factors in collection activity after the balance sheet date, but prior to the date of financial statement issuance. If an entity uses one or both of the practical expedient and/or accounting policy elections, disclosure is mandatory.

Conclusion

Lastly, such advice would be administered on a forward-looking basis, and both of these entities (PCC and FASB) will make the ultimate findings and guidelines of the implementation dates once industry professionals’ comments are considered. However, entities will likely be able to utilize these guidelines sooner.

For eligible companies, these standards could provide greater flexibility and the ability to divert resources to more productive allocations.