When investors think about building a strong equity portfolio, U.S. stocks often dominate the conversation. The United States is home to many of the world’s most innovative, profitable, and well-known companies, and has a history of delivering strong long-term returns. However, the United States is not the only country with successful, growth-oriented businesses. In fact, nearly half of the global equity market is located outside the United States, offering investors a much broader opportunity than in domestic markets alone.
Despite this reality, many investors stick to a home country bias. This behavioral tendency means they prefer companies headquartered in their own country because they’re more familiar and feel safer. Unfortunately, home country bias can unintentionally increase portfolio risk. A singular concentration of investments in one geographic region exposes investors to country-specific economic cycles, policy changes, and market disruptions, while limiting access to attractive opportunities elsewhere in the world.
Global investing offers the following benefits:
Overall Diversification – Spreading investments across different markets, sectors, industries, companies and currencies in various countries improves opportunities for higher growth potential while balancing risk.
Highly Regarded Brand Names – Investing internationally offers access to a larger universe of well-established global brands. Household names such as Toyota, Nestlé, and Samsung are headquartered outside the United States, yet they generate revenues throughout the world, boasting strong balance sheets, consistent cash flow, and favorable long-term prospects. International stocks offer investors exposure to global innovation and consumption trends beyond U.S. markets.
Sector Diversification – In recent years, the U.S. stock market has become saturated with information technology and related industries – even among broad market index funds. While tech is a powerful growth driver, this concentration increases portfolio risk if the sector underperforms. International markets tend to have greater representation in other sectors, such as industrials, financials, materials, and consumer staples, so adding international stocks can help diversify overall sector exposure.
Currency Diversification – International investing exposes U.S. investors to foreign currencies, which reflect the economic conditions of their respective countries. Because currencies do not always move in tandem, holding assets denominated in multiple currencies can help reduce overall portfolio volatility. For example, if the U.S. dollar weakens, gains from foreign currencies may partially offset losses in U.S. dollar-denominated investments. While currency movements can add risk in the short term, they may provide an additional layer of diversification over the long term.
Country Diversification – International investing extends beyond developed markets to include emerging economies around the globe. Emerging markets are countries experiencing rapid economic growth, industrialization, and rising household incomes. Examples include India, Brazil, South Korea, and Taiwan. While emerging markets can offer higher growth potential, they also tend to be more volatile. For this reason, investors should consider allocating only a modest portion of their international exposure to emerging markets as part of a diversified strategy.
Diversify Risk Via Your Investment Vehicle
While international stocks offer diversification and growth potential, they also come with distinct risks, including regulatory differences, lower market liquidity, and political instability. Also note that international investments may involve higher transaction costs compared to domestic securities, especially when purchasing individual foreign stocks
Investors can help mitigate these risks by choosing inherently diversified investment vehicles, such as international mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Broad index-tracking funds are often the most cost-effective way to gain exposure, while professionally managed mutual funds can actively navigate changing global conditions.
International stocks provide access to companies, markets, and currencies that cannot be reached through domestic investments alone. When thoughtfully integrated into a portfolio, they may enhance diversification and improve long-term risk-adjusted returns.
The Value of Diversifying with International Stocks
March 1, 2026 · Blog, Financial Planning
⏱ 4 min read
When investors think about building a strong equity portfolio, U.S. stocks often dominate the conversation. The United States is home to many of the world’s most innovative, profitable, and well-known companies, and has a history of delivering strong long-term returns. However, the United States is not the only country with successful, growth-oriented businesses. In fact, nearly half of the global equity market is located outside the United States, offering investors a much broader opportunity than in domestic markets alone.
Despite this reality, many investors stick to a home country bias. This behavioral tendency means they prefer companies headquartered in their own country because they’re more familiar and feel safer. Unfortunately, home country bias can unintentionally increase portfolio risk. A singular concentration of investments in one geographic region exposes investors to country-specific economic cycles, policy changes, and market disruptions, while limiting access to attractive opportunities elsewhere in the world.
Global investing offers the following benefits:
Overall Diversification – Spreading investments across different markets, sectors, industries, companies and currencies in various countries improves opportunities for higher growth potential while balancing risk.
Highly Regarded Brand Names – Investing internationally offers access to a larger universe of well-established global brands. Household names such as Toyota, Nestlé, and Samsung are headquartered outside the United States, yet they generate revenues throughout the world, boasting strong balance sheets, consistent cash flow, and favorable long-term prospects. International stocks offer investors exposure to global innovation and consumption trends beyond U.S. markets.
Sector Diversification – In recent years, the U.S. stock market has become saturated with information technology and related industries – even among broad market index funds. While tech is a powerful growth driver, this concentration increases portfolio risk if the sector underperforms. International markets tend to have greater representation in other sectors, such as industrials, financials, materials, and consumer staples, so adding international stocks can help diversify overall sector exposure.
Currency Diversification – International investing exposes U.S. investors to foreign currencies, which reflect the economic conditions of their respective countries. Because currencies do not always move in tandem, holding assets denominated in multiple currencies can help reduce overall portfolio volatility. For example, if the U.S. dollar weakens, gains from foreign currencies may partially offset losses in U.S. dollar-denominated investments. While currency movements can add risk in the short term, they may provide an additional layer of diversification over the long term.
Country Diversification – International investing extends beyond developed markets to include emerging economies around the globe. Emerging markets are countries experiencing rapid economic growth, industrialization, and rising household incomes. Examples include India, Brazil, South Korea, and Taiwan. While emerging markets can offer higher growth potential, they also tend to be more volatile. For this reason, investors should consider allocating only a modest portion of their international exposure to emerging markets as part of a diversified strategy.
Diversify Risk Via Your Investment Vehicle
While international stocks offer diversification and growth potential, they also come with distinct risks, including regulatory differences, lower market liquidity, and political instability. Also note that international investments may involve higher transaction costs compared to domestic securities, especially when purchasing individual foreign stocks
Investors can help mitigate these risks by choosing inherently diversified investment vehicles, such as international mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Broad index-tracking funds are often the most cost-effective way to gain exposure, while professionally managed mutual funds can actively navigate changing global conditions.
International stocks provide access to companies, markets, and currencies that cannot be reached through domestic investments alone. When thoughtfully integrated into a portfolio, they may enhance diversification and improve long-term risk-adjusted returns.
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
With 57 percent of public companies offering their workers employee stock purchase plans (ESPPs), according to the National Association of Stock Plan Professionals (NASPP), understanding how qualifying dispositions work is an essential skill.
The concept refers to someone selling or otherwise “disposing” of equities who sees advantageous tax benefits. This is especially pronounced when a stockholder’s normal tax income rate differs markedly from prevailing tax rates for long-term investments.
Eligible individuals are those employed by a company that offers such a benefit. There are two different options available for worker participation.
The first option is where employees participate in the ESPP. The second option is through an incentive stock option plan (ISOs). It’s noteworthy to distinguish that the ESPP is for most employees employed after a particular time at a company. However, ISOs are reserved primarily for senior management and executives, such as chief financial officers (CFOs), chief executive officers (CEOs), etc.
What determines if it’s a qualifying disposition is how long the employee keeps the equities prior to the sale.
ESPP Example
If 100 shares are acquired via ESPP, bought via a 10 percent discount to the prevailing offer of $40, the purchase of 100 shares of stock at $36 equals $3,600. If the stock appreciates to $60 in the future, the difference (and capital gain) would be $2,400 in profits ($6,000 – $3,600).
Qualifying Disposition Example
This scenario breaks down how the discount and, ultimately, how capital gains are treated.
The discount of $4 per share is taxed at the employee’s present wage rate. Depending on the tax rate the employee is taxed at, the liability would be ($4 a share, multiplied by 100, times the tax rate of 30 percent or $120).
Using the ESPP example’s figures, the long-term gain of $24 per share (times 100 shares) is taxed based on the lesser rate of say 15 percent. ($3.60/share times 100 = $360).
Therefore, the entire taxes owed end up being $120 + $360 = $480.
Non-Qualifying Disposition Example
However, for stock liquidations not meeting qualifying disposition criteria, the $2,400 would see a 35 percent capital gains tax ($2,400 multiplied by 35 percent = $840).
Based on the qualifying versus non-qualifying distribution scenarios, the difference of $360 in capital gains savings represents a stark contrast in tax obligations. Therefore, it’s important to determine how to meet a qualifying disposition.
It requires the following criteria to be met. The stock sale date must occur at a minimum of 12 months from the stock purchase date. It also must be held for at least 24 months from the ESPP offer date or the ISO stock warrant date.
While transactions may differ in the quantity of shares sold and for how much, the timing for workers selling the shares is far less variable. It is important for employers to ensure workers are familiar with the tax implications.
Sources
https://www.naspp.com/blog/five-trends-in-espps
Understanding Qualifying Dispositions
March 1, 2026 · Blog, General Business News, Uncategorized
⏱ 3 min read
With 57 percent of public companies offering their workers employee stock purchase plans (ESPPs), according to the National Association of Stock Plan Professionals (NASPP), understanding how qualifying dispositions work is an essential skill.
The concept refers to someone selling or otherwise “disposing” of equities who sees advantageous tax benefits. This is especially pronounced when a stockholder’s normal tax income rate differs markedly from prevailing tax rates for long-term investments.
Eligible individuals are those employed by a company that offers such a benefit. There are two different options available for worker participation.
The first option is where employees participate in the ESPP. The second option is through an incentive stock option plan (ISOs). It’s noteworthy to distinguish that the ESPP is for most employees employed after a particular time at a company. However, ISOs are reserved primarily for senior management and executives, such as chief financial officers (CFOs), chief executive officers (CEOs), etc.
What determines if it’s a qualifying disposition is how long the employee keeps the equities prior to the sale.
ESPP Example
If 100 shares are acquired via ESPP, bought via a 10 percent discount to the prevailing offer of $40, the purchase of 100 shares of stock at $36 equals $3,600. If the stock appreciates to $60 in the future, the difference (and capital gain) would be $2,400 in profits ($6,000 – $3,600).
Qualifying Disposition Example
This scenario breaks down how the discount and, ultimately, how capital gains are treated.
The discount of $4 per share is taxed at the employee’s present wage rate. Depending on the tax rate the employee is taxed at, the liability would be ($4 a share, multiplied by 100, times the tax rate of 30 percent or $120).
Using the ESPP example’s figures, the long-term gain of $24 per share (times 100 shares) is taxed based on the lesser rate of say 15 percent. ($3.60/share times 100 = $360).
Therefore, the entire taxes owed end up being $120 + $360 = $480.
Non-Qualifying Disposition Example
However, for stock liquidations not meeting qualifying disposition criteria, the $2,400 would see a 35 percent capital gains tax ($2,400 multiplied by 35 percent = $840).
Based on the qualifying versus non-qualifying distribution scenarios, the difference of $360 in capital gains savings represents a stark contrast in tax obligations. Therefore, it’s important to determine how to meet a qualifying disposition.
It requires the following criteria to be met. The stock sale date must occur at a minimum of 12 months from the stock purchase date. It also must be held for at least 24 months from the ESPP offer date or the ISO stock warrant date.
While transactions may differ in the quantity of shares sold and for how much, the timing for workers selling the shares is far less variable. It is important for employers to ensure workers are familiar with the tax implications.
Sources
https://www.naspp.com/blog/five-trends-in-espps
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer a competitive advantage; it has become a necessary infrastructure. Businesses now heavily rely on AI-powered systems, from automated customer service to predictive analytics and decision-making tools. These platforms are cloud-based, and their reliance comes with growing concern of AI lock-in. This dependence on major cloud providers and the convenience of Big Tech ecosystems can turn into long-term dependency. In response, cloud sovereignty is gaining momentum.
What Is Cloud Sovereignty?
Cloud sovereignty refers to the ability of an organization to maintain full control over its data, infrastructure, and digital assets. This includes where data is stored, how it is processed, and which legal jurisdiction governs it.
Unlike traditional cloud hosting, where companies rely on a single global provider, cloud sovereignty emphasizes:
Data ownership and portability
Compliance with local laws and regulations
Reduced dependence on foreign-controlled infrastructure
Strategic control over AI models and workflows
The Rise of Big Tech and the AI Lock-in Problem
Over the past decade, companies like AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure have built highly integrated AI ecosystems, especially since the surge of generative AI. These platforms offer powerful tools, including proprietary machine learning services, exclusive Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), pre-trained AI models, and seamless infrastructure scaling.
However, when businesses build their AI systems entirely on one provider’s proprietary tools, switching becomes difficult. Platform dependency can also create serious risks when a vendor fails. A good example is the collapse of Builder.ai, an AI app builder backed by giants like Microsoft and the Qatar Investment Authority. Its collapse was an indicator that companies do not have complete control over the software and data on which their operations depend. This is what is known as AI Lock-in, where:
AI models rely on proprietary APIs
Data pipelines are optimized for a specific cloud architecture
Workflows depend on unique vendor tools
Migration costs become prohibitively high
As a result, businesses suffer:
Escalating operational costs
Limited negotiating power
Reduced flexibility
Strategic vulnerability
In 2026, with AI deeply embedded into operations, being locked-in can threaten long-term agility and innovation.
Regulatory Pressure is Accelerating the Shift
Governments worldwide are tightening digital sovereignty and data protection rules. From stricter data residency laws to AI governance frameworks, compliance is no longer optional. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications face heightened scrutiny. They must prove where data is stored, who can access it, and how AI models are trained and governed. Additionally, businesses can’t afford regulatory risks. Regulations such as the CLOUD Act demand data access transparency, while different states are pushing for data localization policies.
Relying entirely on a foreign-controlled AI ecosystem can raise compliance risks. In some regions, businesses are now required to use local or sovereign cloud providers for sensitive workloads. Gartner predicts 35 percent of countries will adopt region-specific AI platforms by 2027 as countries increase investment in domestic AI stacks to meet sovereignty goals.
Regulation, once seen as a burden, is now a strategic driver pushing companies toward sovereign-first strategies.
How Businesses Are Avoiding AI Lock-in Trap
Businesses are not abandoning cloud AI. Instead, they are becoming more strategic about how they implement it.
Embracing open-source and interoperable AI Many businesses are adopting open-source AI frameworks and models to reduce dependency on proprietary systems. By building on interoperable standards, they maintain flexibility to deploy workloads across different environments. This approach allows businesses to experiment freely without being tied to a single vendor’s ecosystem.
Adopting multi-cloud and hybrid strategies Rather than relying on one provider, a business can distribute workloads across multiple clouds. This reduces operational risk, strengthens negotiation leverage, enhances flexibility and improves resilience. Hybrid models, where on-premise infrastructure is combined with cloud services, are also growing in popularity. They ensure sensitive data remains locally controlled while still leveraging AI scalability.
Partnering with sovereign or regional cloud providers Regional cloud providers are gaining traction as they offer local data hosting, compliance with national regulations, and greater transparency.
Strengthening contract and governance frameworks Procurement and legal teams are now playing a more active role in cloud decisions. They negotiate stronger data portability clauses, clear exit strategies, transparent pricing structures, and model ownership rights.
Final Thoughts
In 2026, the real risk is not using AI, but losing control over it.
Cloud sovereignty represents a strategic shift while not rejecting Big Tech. It must be viewed as the ability to act strategically, as no business can dominate every layer of the AI stack due to constraints like the high cost of training advanced AI models.
Businesses that prioritize sovereignty today are building resilient, flexible, and future-ready AI ecosystems. Those who ignore it may find themselves powerful – but trapped.
Cloud Sovereignty vs. Big Tech: How Businesses Are Avoiding the ‘AI Lock-in’ Trap in 2026
March 1, 2026 · Blog, Uncategorized, What's New in Technology
⏱ 4 min read
Artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer a competitive advantage; it has become a necessary infrastructure. Businesses now heavily rely on AI-powered systems, from automated customer service to predictive analytics and decision-making tools. These platforms are cloud-based, and their reliance comes with growing concern of AI lock-in. This dependence on major cloud providers and the convenience of Big Tech ecosystems can turn into long-term dependency. In response, cloud sovereignty is gaining momentum.
What Is Cloud Sovereignty?
Cloud sovereignty refers to the ability of an organization to maintain full control over its data, infrastructure, and digital assets. This includes where data is stored, how it is processed, and which legal jurisdiction governs it.
Unlike traditional cloud hosting, where companies rely on a single global provider, cloud sovereignty emphasizes:
Data ownership and portability
Compliance with local laws and regulations
Reduced dependence on foreign-controlled infrastructure
Strategic control over AI models and workflows
The Rise of Big Tech and the AI Lock-in Problem
Over the past decade, companies like AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure have built highly integrated AI ecosystems, especially since the surge of generative AI. These platforms offer powerful tools, including proprietary machine learning services, exclusive Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), pre-trained AI models, and seamless infrastructure scaling.
However, when businesses build their AI systems entirely on one provider’s proprietary tools, switching becomes difficult. Platform dependency can also create serious risks when a vendor fails. A good example is the collapse of Builder.ai, an AI app builder backed by giants like Microsoft and the Qatar Investment Authority. Its collapse was an indicator that companies do not have complete control over the software and data on which their operations depend. This is what is known as AI Lock-in, where:
AI models rely on proprietary APIs
Data pipelines are optimized for a specific cloud architecture
Workflows depend on unique vendor tools
Migration costs become prohibitively high
As a result, businesses suffer:
Escalating operational costs
Limited negotiating power
Reduced flexibility
Strategic vulnerability
In 2026, with AI deeply embedded into operations, being locked-in can threaten long-term agility and innovation.
Regulatory Pressure is Accelerating the Shift
Governments worldwide are tightening digital sovereignty and data protection rules. From stricter data residency laws to AI governance frameworks, compliance is no longer optional. Industries such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications face heightened scrutiny. They must prove where data is stored, who can access it, and how AI models are trained and governed. Additionally, businesses can’t afford regulatory risks. Regulations such as the CLOUD Act demand data access transparency, while different states are pushing for data localization policies.
Relying entirely on a foreign-controlled AI ecosystem can raise compliance risks. In some regions, businesses are now required to use local or sovereign cloud providers for sensitive workloads. Gartner predicts 35 percent of countries will adopt region-specific AI platforms by 2027 as countries increase investment in domestic AI stacks to meet sovereignty goals.
Regulation, once seen as a burden, is now a strategic driver pushing companies toward sovereign-first strategies.
How Businesses Are Avoiding AI Lock-in Trap
Businesses are not abandoning cloud AI. Instead, they are becoming more strategic about how they implement it.
Embracing open-source and interoperable AI Many businesses are adopting open-source AI frameworks and models to reduce dependency on proprietary systems. By building on interoperable standards, they maintain flexibility to deploy workloads across different environments. This approach allows businesses to experiment freely without being tied to a single vendor’s ecosystem.
Adopting multi-cloud and hybrid strategies Rather than relying on one provider, a business can distribute workloads across multiple clouds. This reduces operational risk, strengthens negotiation leverage, enhances flexibility and improves resilience. Hybrid models, where on-premise infrastructure is combined with cloud services, are also growing in popularity. They ensure sensitive data remains locally controlled while still leveraging AI scalability.
Partnering with sovereign or regional cloud providers Regional cloud providers are gaining traction as they offer local data hosting, compliance with national regulations, and greater transparency.
Strengthening contract and governance frameworks Procurement and legal teams are now playing a more active role in cloud decisions. They negotiate stronger data portability clauses, clear exit strategies, transparent pricing structures, and model ownership rights.
Final Thoughts
In 2026, the real risk is not using AI, but losing control over it.
Cloud sovereignty represents a strategic shift while not rejecting Big Tech. It must be viewed as the ability to act strategically, as no business can dominate every layer of the AI stack due to constraints like the high cost of training advanced AI models.
Businesses that prioritize sovereignty today are building resilient, flexible, and future-ready AI ecosystems. Those who ignore it may find themselves powerful – but trapped.
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the DC Income and Franchise Tax Conformity and Revision Temporary Amendment Act of 2025 (HJRes 142) – After passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the Council of the District of Columbia (DC) opted out of the tax code from the Act, amending several provisions and restoring the DC child tax credit. This resolution nullifies DC’s amended legislation. It was introduced on Jan. 22 by Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX). It passed in the House on Feb. 4, the Senate on Feb. 12, and was enacted on Feb. 18.
Semiquincentennial Congressional Time Capsule Act (S 3705) – This bill instructs the Architect of the Capitol to bury a time capsule in the Capitol Visitor Center (on or before July 4, 2026) as part of this year’s 250th anniversary celebration of the nation’s founding. The purpose of the capsule is to represent legislative milestones to date via a joint letter to the future Congress by the majority and minority leaders of the Senate and the House. The time capsule is meant to remain there until July 4, 2276, the nation’s 500th anniversary. The legislation was introduced by Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) on Jan. 27. It passed the Senate on Jan. 27, the House on Feb. 9, and was signed into law by the president on Feb. 18.
Bankruptcy Administration Improvement Act of 2025 (S 3424) – This Act was introduced by Rep. Christopher Coons (D-DE) on Dec. 10, 2025, and passed in the Senate on the same day. It cleared the House on Jan. 12 and was signed into law on Feb. 6. The bill makes alterations to the administration of bankruptcy cases by increasing fees paid to trustees in Chapter 7 (liquidation) cases, and extends by five years the fees paid to trustees in Chapter 11 (reorganization) cases. It also extends the term of bankruptcy judgeships in various districts, as well as other provisions.
Ending Improper Payments to Deceased People Act (S 269) – This legislation requires the Social Security Administration (SSA) to share its death records with the Treasury Department in order to prevent improper payments to deceased individuals. In the past, this bill had to be extended every three years, but the new bill makes the requirement permanent. The bill was introduced by Sen. John Kennedy (R-TN) on Jan. 28, 2025. It passed unanimously in the Senate on Sept. 19, 2025, cleared the House on Jan. 13, and was enacted on Feb. 10.
Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (S 1383) – This controversial voting bill passed in the House on Feb. 11. The Republicans in the Senate have secured 50 votes for passage, but the bill requires 60. The provisions in the current bill include requiring:
Each state is to submit full voter rolls to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for verification of citizenship via its SAVE system, which has historically had a high error rate of flagging citizens as non-citizens.
Voter roll purges every 30 days and end the 90-day quiet period that allows voters mistakenly purged time to re-register before Election Day.
New or changing voter registrants to show proof of U.S. citizenship (birth certificate or passport; five states already meet this requirement for a Real ID driver’s license).
Voters to show photo ID at polls in order to vote (38 states already require this)
A ban on automatically mailing ballots to all voters (currently used by eight states and DC); voters would have to send individual requests to receive a mail ballot.
Democrats in the Senate have vowed to block passage via filibuster.
Burying Time Capsules, Ending Payments to Dead People, and Safeguarding Voting Rights for U.S. Citizens
March 1, 2026 · Blog, Congress at Work, Uncategorized
⏱ 3 min read
Disapproving the action of the District of Columbia Council in approving the DC Income and Franchise Tax Conformity and Revision Temporary Amendment Act of 2025 (HJRes 142) – After passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the Council of the District of Columbia (DC) opted out of the tax code from the Act, amending several provisions and restoring the DC child tax credit. This resolution nullifies DC’s amended legislation. It was introduced on Jan. 22 by Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX). It passed in the House on Feb. 4, the Senate on Feb. 12, and was enacted on Feb. 18.
Semiquincentennial Congressional Time Capsule Act (S 3705) – This bill instructs the Architect of the Capitol to bury a time capsule in the Capitol Visitor Center (on or before July 4, 2026) as part of this year’s 250th anniversary celebration of the nation’s founding. The purpose of the capsule is to represent legislative milestones to date via a joint letter to the future Congress by the majority and minority leaders of the Senate and the House. The time capsule is meant to remain there until July 4, 2276, the nation’s 500th anniversary. The legislation was introduced by Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) on Jan. 27. It passed the Senate on Jan. 27, the House on Feb. 9, and was signed into law by the president on Feb. 18.
Bankruptcy Administration Improvement Act of 2025 (S 3424) – This Act was introduced by Rep. Christopher Coons (D-DE) on Dec. 10, 2025, and passed in the Senate on the same day. It cleared the House on Jan. 12 and was signed into law on Feb. 6. The bill makes alterations to the administration of bankruptcy cases by increasing fees paid to trustees in Chapter 7 (liquidation) cases, and extends by five years the fees paid to trustees in Chapter 11 (reorganization) cases. It also extends the term of bankruptcy judgeships in various districts, as well as other provisions.
Ending Improper Payments to Deceased People Act (S 269) – This legislation requires the Social Security Administration (SSA) to share its death records with the Treasury Department in order to prevent improper payments to deceased individuals. In the past, this bill had to be extended every three years, but the new bill makes the requirement permanent. The bill was introduced by Sen. John Kennedy (R-TN) on Jan. 28, 2025. It passed unanimously in the Senate on Sept. 19, 2025, cleared the House on Jan. 13, and was enacted on Feb. 10.
Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act (S 1383) – This controversial voting bill passed in the House on Feb. 11. The Republicans in the Senate have secured 50 votes for passage, but the bill requires 60. The provisions in the current bill include requiring:
Each state is to submit full voter rolls to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for verification of citizenship via its SAVE system, which has historically had a high error rate of flagging citizens as non-citizens.
Voter roll purges every 30 days and end the 90-day quiet period that allows voters mistakenly purged time to re-register before Election Day.
New or changing voter registrants to show proof of U.S. citizenship (birth certificate or passport; five states already meet this requirement for a Real ID driver’s license).
Voters to show photo ID at polls in order to vote (38 states already require this)
A ban on automatically mailing ballots to all voters (currently used by eight states and DC); voters would have to send individual requests to receive a mail ballot.
Democrats in the Senate have vowed to block passage via filibuster.
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
Wiring money is like sending cash: Once you’ve sent it, it’s gone. It is very difficult to retrieve – in fact, more difficult than recovering physical dollar bills.
For businesses, always call the recipient to verify ACH details before sending; this is required by law in 50 states. This law does not require calling, but if the sender’s or recipient’s email is hacked, calling will help prevent the hacker from changing ACH details in a hacked email account.
If wire fraud takes place due to a security breach, such as a hacker infiltrating your account and initiating a wire transfer, you may have protection. Reputable financial institutions will generally cover your losses in the case of a cyber attack. Recoverability is dependent, however, on whether the wire was properly authorized or unauthorized and the payment type (wire vs. ACH). However, if you fall for a scam and initiate the wire transfer yourself, you’re probably out of luck.
Another scenario is having an incorrect address or account number in your wire transfer instructions. For example, say you want to send a large sum of money to your lender to pay off your mortgage. It’s a good idea to contact the institution directly (by phone or in person) and ask them to tell you where to send your wire transfer to match it with the printed instructions you may have received. Always proofread the wire transfer instructions carefully.
Should you accidentally transpose the numbers in a wire transfer, you could lose that money. If you contact your bank immediately to report the error, they may be able to recall the funds. However, if the recipient has already accepted the transfer, particularly if they have transferred the money elsewhere, it is almost impossible to recover.
Remember, wire transfers settle quickly and are typically irreversible once accepted. That is why they are one of the prime targets for cybercriminals. If you are unfamiliar with the person or institution where you are wiring money, research them first to confirm their identity and see if there are any complaints or red flags associated with the entity. If you had no reason to initiate the wire transfer before being contacted, you should be especially suspicious. Be extremely skeptical of unsolicited urgent requests, especially when instructions change, or you can’t verify independently
The following are some common scams perpetuated today.
Bank Fraud
Your bank or investment firm calls you directly to alert you to a possible scam; someone is attempting to hack into your account and steal your money. They may even verify your account with details they have obtained – such as your name, address, and perhaps even your Social Security and account numbers. Rather than an affirmation of their legitimacy, this should be a red flag. First of all, no legitimate financial institution or government agency would relay this information over the phone. Second, a fraudster may tell you the best way to block the potential hack is to open a new account and transfer your money there. This is a red flag. Third, the scammer may insist that time is of the essence – you must act immediately before your money is stolen.
If you get a call like this, hang up and either call (the number on your statement or debit/credit card) or visit your local bank branch to inquire about the call. Chances are good that the bank will confirm there is no breach and that your account is safe.
Dating Apps
Dating apps are the 21st-century version of blind dates. According to Statista, more than 60 million Americans used dating apps in 2024. Instead of meeting organically in a bar or at a party, users peruse dating profiles to find a prospective mate. Unfortunately, these platforms are rife with money-seeking predators – and they can be very patient.
Many online relationship predators interact for months before the scammer mentions that he or she is having money trouble. They may even wait for their paramour to offer money to help them out. Remember that the red flags apply – you didn’t initiate the need. The need for funds should never be immediate. You should research and verify the legitimacy of any person who would agree to accept money from someone they met online. Remember, once you send money, you may never hear from that person again. Or they may continue to interact, but you could get another request for funds a little further down the road.
One way to detect a dating app fraudster is by noticing clues that they are not who they claim to be. For example, many scammers live in other countries. They may not be familiar with common local interests in the town or city where they say they are from. Or, you may notice unusual grammar or phrasing in their communications, indicating English is not their native language.
The Friend or Relative Scam
One of the most heart-rending scams is when a person – often a senior citizen – is asked by a struggling friend or family member to send money. For example, a grandchild away at college who says she doesn’t want her parents to know she needs money. Pulling at the heartstrings, paired with aging cognitive decline, is a recipe for wire transfer fraud. It’s a good idea to establish a “family password” with which to verify proof of identity for suspicious scenarios. Also, call the family member or friend back at a known number for verification before sending money.
Investment Scam
The too-good-to-be-true investment opportunity is an old scam still used today, often to entice the purchase of cryptocurrency with cash. As with all these potential scams, do your due diligence and confirm the legitimacy of the receiver and their details.
The best way to prevent money wire fraud is to stay up to date with the latest scams and trust your gut: Do not act until you have thoroughly researched the details.
Scam-Proof Guidelines for Wiring Money
February 1, 2026 · Blog, Financial Planning, Uncategorized
⏱ 6 min read
Wiring money is like sending cash: Once you’ve sent it, it’s gone. It is very difficult to retrieve – in fact, more difficult than recovering physical dollar bills.
For businesses, always call the recipient to verify ACH details before sending; this is required by law in 50 states. This law does not require calling, but if the sender’s or recipient’s email is hacked, calling will help prevent the hacker from changing ACH details in a hacked email account.
If wire fraud takes place due to a security breach, such as a hacker infiltrating your account and initiating a wire transfer, you may have protection. Reputable financial institutions will generally cover your losses in the case of a cyber attack. Recoverability is dependent, however, on whether the wire was properly authorized or unauthorized and the payment type (wire vs. ACH). However, if you fall for a scam and initiate the wire transfer yourself, you’re probably out of luck.
Another scenario is having an incorrect address or account number in your wire transfer instructions. For example, say you want to send a large sum of money to your lender to pay off your mortgage. It’s a good idea to contact the institution directly (by phone or in person) and ask them to tell you where to send your wire transfer to match it with the printed instructions you may have received. Always proofread the wire transfer instructions carefully.
Should you accidentally transpose the numbers in a wire transfer, you could lose that money. If you contact your bank immediately to report the error, they may be able to recall the funds. However, if the recipient has already accepted the transfer, particularly if they have transferred the money elsewhere, it is almost impossible to recover.
Remember, wire transfers settle quickly and are typically irreversible once accepted. That is why they are one of the prime targets for cybercriminals. If you are unfamiliar with the person or institution where you are wiring money, research them first to confirm their identity and see if there are any complaints or red flags associated with the entity. If you had no reason to initiate the wire transfer before being contacted, you should be especially suspicious. Be extremely skeptical of unsolicited urgent requests, especially when instructions change, or you can’t verify independently
The following are some common scams perpetuated today.
Bank Fraud
Your bank or investment firm calls you directly to alert you to a possible scam; someone is attempting to hack into your account and steal your money. They may even verify your account with details they have obtained – such as your name, address, and perhaps even your Social Security and account numbers. Rather than an affirmation of their legitimacy, this should be a red flag. First of all, no legitimate financial institution or government agency would relay this information over the phone. Second, a fraudster may tell you the best way to block the potential hack is to open a new account and transfer your money there. This is a red flag. Third, the scammer may insist that time is of the essence – you must act immediately before your money is stolen.
If you get a call like this, hang up and either call (the number on your statement or debit/credit card) or visit your local bank branch to inquire about the call. Chances are good that the bank will confirm there is no breach and that your account is safe.
Dating Apps
Dating apps are the 21st-century version of blind dates. According to Statista, more than 60 million Americans used dating apps in 2024. Instead of meeting organically in a bar or at a party, users peruse dating profiles to find a prospective mate. Unfortunately, these platforms are rife with money-seeking predators – and they can be very patient.
Many online relationship predators interact for months before the scammer mentions that he or she is having money trouble. They may even wait for their paramour to offer money to help them out. Remember that the red flags apply – you didn’t initiate the need. The need for funds should never be immediate. You should research and verify the legitimacy of any person who would agree to accept money from someone they met online. Remember, once you send money, you may never hear from that person again. Or they may continue to interact, but you could get another request for funds a little further down the road.
One way to detect a dating app fraudster is by noticing clues that they are not who they claim to be. For example, many scammers live in other countries. They may not be familiar with common local interests in the town or city where they say they are from. Or, you may notice unusual grammar or phrasing in their communications, indicating English is not their native language.
The Friend or Relative Scam
One of the most heart-rending scams is when a person – often a senior citizen – is asked by a struggling friend or family member to send money. For example, a grandchild away at college who says she doesn’t want her parents to know she needs money. Pulling at the heartstrings, paired with aging cognitive decline, is a recipe for wire transfer fraud. It’s a good idea to establish a “family password” with which to verify proof of identity for suspicious scenarios. Also, call the family member or friend back at a known number for verification before sending money.
Investment Scam
The too-good-to-be-true investment opportunity is an old scam still used today, often to entice the purchase of cryptocurrency with cash. As with all these potential scams, do your due diligence and confirm the legitimacy of the receiver and their details.
The best way to prevent money wire fraud is to stay up to date with the latest scams and trust your gut: Do not act until you have thoroughly researched the details.
Disclaimer
These articles are intended to provide general resources for the tax and accounting needs of small businesses and individuals. Service2Client LLC is the author, but is not engaged in rendering specific legal, accounting, financial or professional advice. Service2Client LLC makes no representation that the recommendations of Service2Client LLC will achieve any result. The NSAD has not reviewed any of the Service2Client LLC content. Readers are encouraged to contact a professional regarding the topics in these articles. The images linked to these articles are protected by copyright and should not be copied for any reason.
When investors think about building a strong equity portfolio, U.S. stocks often dominate the conversation. The United States is home to many of the world’s most innovative, profitable, and well-known companies, and has a history of delivering strong long-term returns. However, the United States is not the only country with successful, growth-oriented businesses. In fact, nearly half of the global equity market is located outside the United States, offering investors a much broader opportunity than in domestic markets alone.
With 57 percent of public companies offering their workers employee stock purchase plans (ESPPs), according to the National Association of Stock Plan Professionals (NASPP), understanding how qualifying dispositions work is an essential skill.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer a competitive advantage; it has become a necessary infrastructure. Businesses now heavily rely on AI-powered systems, from automated customer service to predictive analytics and decision-making tools. These platforms are cloud-based, and their reliance comes with growing concern of AI lock-in. This dependence on major cloud providers and the convenience of Big Tech ecosystems can turn into long-term dependency. In response, cloud sovereignty is gaining momentum.
Wiring money is like sending cash: Once you’ve sent it, it’s gone. It is very difficult to retrieve – in fact, more difficult than recovering physical dollar bills.