Former President and current candidate Donald Trump introduced a new policy of his in a recent Arizona rally: No more income tax on overtime pay. This follows both Trump and Vice President Harris’ proposal for a no income tax on tips policy, as well.
Below we will look at the two recent proposals and what they could mean for both taxpayers and businesses.
No Tax on Tips
The no tax on tips policy looks to lighten the tax burden on service industry workers. According to the Fair Labor and Standards Act, anyone who “customarily and regularly” receives $30 or more in tips per month is considered a tipped worker. The mechanism to exempt tip income could possibly come through three different mechanisms.
One option would be to categorize tips as gifts. Service employees are often paid wages lower than the minimum wage (as low as $2.31 per hour), with employers required to “top-up” an employee to the federal minimum wage of $7.25 if tips don’t at least make up the difference themselves. As a result, considering tips as gifts may not legally work.
A second option is to treat a specified amount of tips as non-taxable income. Consider a policy, for example, in which up to $25,000 in tips is treated as non-taxable income. Legally, this is straightforward, but it could have various knock-off effects on those it is intended to help. For example, a taxpayer’s gross income could fall so low they no longer qualify for the earned income tax credit and end up being a net negative.
Finally, there is a third option of creating a new deduction; allowing taxpayers to first claim the income and then take a deduction to offset it. The issue here is that given the claimed income level of most tipped workers, an additional deduction may not be one-for-one incrementally beneficial to the standard deduction. In other words, so much of their income is already non-taxable, this wouldn’t make much of a difference.
Side-Effects
Depending on how the policy is structured, there are negative side effects that could accompany the policy change. Compliance with reporting tip income is already spotty at best. It’s not uncommon for tipped workers to underreport their tip income, especially for cash tips. The main concern is that employers and employees may try to game the system. There is a real chance that who is tipped changes and people may try to change compensation schemes so that other types of income are then changed to tip income to take advantage of the changes; especially for taxpayers for whom the law was never intended to help.
Non-Taxable Overtime
The second proposal is to exempt overtime wages from income taxation. The idea is that it would help workers who get to keep more of their money; and at the same time helping businesses, since employees would be incentivized to work more hours, thereby negating the need to hire more employees. While on the surface it seems like a policy to help the hardest working, there are potential problems.
Unfair to Regular Wage Earners
There are two possible issues. First, it leaves behind hourly workers who cannot work overtime due to other responsibilities, health or their job’s duties. It also disadvantages those who have to work multiple jobs (because their job doesn’t offer overtime, but they need the money).
Second, it doesn’t consider salaried positions. There are many salaried positions, where workers are exempt from overtime laws – and a large swath of these are not highly paid positions.
Administrative Complications
Employers and the IRS would need to deal with distinguishing between regular wages and overtime earnings. What is considered overtime is not always clear when there are pay concepts such as bonuses, shift differentials, commissions or other alternative payment arrangements. It would also add significant complexity to payroll systems.
Conclusion
While both policies are well intended, the devil is in the details. Implementation would need to be carefully considered; the intended taxpayers might not be the main beneficiaries; and there is room for fraud.
The New Era of “No Tax” Policies: Selective Tax Exemptions and Their Side Effects
October 1, 2024 · Blog, Tax and Financial News, Uncategorized
⏱ 4 min read
Former President and current candidate Donald Trump introduced a new policy of his in a recent Arizona rally: No more income tax on overtime pay. This follows both Trump and Vice President Harris’ proposal for a no income tax on tips policy, as well.
Below we will look at the two recent proposals and what they could mean for both taxpayers and businesses.
No Tax on Tips
The no tax on tips policy looks to lighten the tax burden on service industry workers. According to the Fair Labor and Standards Act, anyone who “customarily and regularly” receives $30 or more in tips per month is considered a tipped worker. The mechanism to exempt tip income could possibly come through three different mechanisms.
One option would be to categorize tips as gifts. Service employees are often paid wages lower than the minimum wage (as low as $2.31 per hour), with employers required to “top-up” an employee to the federal minimum wage of $7.25 if tips don’t at least make up the difference themselves. As a result, considering tips as gifts may not legally work.
A second option is to treat a specified amount of tips as non-taxable income. Consider a policy, for example, in which up to $25,000 in tips is treated as non-taxable income. Legally, this is straightforward, but it could have various knock-off effects on those it is intended to help. For example, a taxpayer’s gross income could fall so low they no longer qualify for the earned income tax credit and end up being a net negative.
Finally, there is a third option of creating a new deduction; allowing taxpayers to first claim the income and then take a deduction to offset it. The issue here is that given the claimed income level of most tipped workers, an additional deduction may not be one-for-one incrementally beneficial to the standard deduction. In other words, so much of their income is already non-taxable, this wouldn’t make much of a difference.
Side-Effects
Depending on how the policy is structured, there are negative side effects that could accompany the policy change. Compliance with reporting tip income is already spotty at best. It’s not uncommon for tipped workers to underreport their tip income, especially for cash tips. The main concern is that employers and employees may try to game the system. There is a real chance that who is tipped changes and people may try to change compensation schemes so that other types of income are then changed to tip income to take advantage of the changes; especially for taxpayers for whom the law was never intended to help.
Non-Taxable Overtime
The second proposal is to exempt overtime wages from income taxation. The idea is that it would help workers who get to keep more of their money; and at the same time helping businesses, since employees would be incentivized to work more hours, thereby negating the need to hire more employees. While on the surface it seems like a policy to help the hardest working, there are potential problems.
Unfair to Regular Wage Earners
There are two possible issues. First, it leaves behind hourly workers who cannot work overtime due to other responsibilities, health or their job’s duties. It also disadvantages those who have to work multiple jobs (because their job doesn’t offer overtime, but they need the money).
Second, it doesn’t consider salaried positions. There are many salaried positions, where workers are exempt from overtime laws – and a large swath of these are not highly paid positions.
Administrative Complications
Employers and the IRS would need to deal with distinguishing between regular wages and overtime earnings. What is considered overtime is not always clear when there are pay concepts such as bonuses, shift differentials, commissions or other alternative payment arrangements. It would also add significant complexity to payroll systems.
Conclusion
While both policies are well intended, the devil is in the details. Implementation would need to be carefully considered; the intended taxpayers might not be the main beneficiaries; and there is room for fraud.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
Analyzing a company’s Accounts Receivables is an effective way to measure its current cash flows and the likelihood of maintaining healthy cash flows. According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Small Business Index (Third Quarter 2024), 68 percent of small business owners reported being content with their third quarter cash flow performance. This illustrates the importance for small business owners to do everything possible to maintain healthy cash flows, including evaluating the quality of accounts receivables (A/R).
Defining Accounts Receivables
This account or line item on the balance sheet gives the business’ managers/owners and investors a measure on how much money a business expects to receive from selling goods or services. It’s an important metric because it’s a measure of what’s owed, but not yet collected from rendered services/goods.
Consideration for Uncollectable Accounts Receivables
While businesses hope to collect 100 percent of their A/Rs, businesses take a realistic view that not everyone will pay up. For whatever reason, A/Rs aren’t always collected and must be accounted for as uncollectable. Therefore, a contra account is setup to account for accounts receivables that turn into bad debt. This contra account is linked to the accounts receivable, an asset reported on the balance sheet, offsetting the accounts receivable balance. However, there are many metrics for companies to manage their health internally, and some of these metrics are discussed below.
Accounts Receivable-to-Sales Ratio
This is determined by taking a “snapshot” of the ratio or division of the accounts receivables divided by sales over a period of time. The resulting calculation is the percentage of a business’ unpaid sales. The higher the accounts receivable-to-sales ratio, the riskier the company’s financial health. It indicates a business has accounts receivables with a low likelihood of being collected. It’s calculated as follows:
AR to Sales = AR / Sales
Since it measures the mix of how much a business relies on cash versus credit, it can prompt an analyst to determine whether a company is able to operate on minimal cash with low fixed costs and limited outstanding debt. It can also prompt an analyst to determine if a company is subject to cyclical sales and is dependent on the business cycle and whether it’s the right time to invest in a company or hold off until a better entry point is established.
Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio
This calculation determines how fast a business can convert its accounts receivables into cash. It calculates this over a discrete period, be it a month, quarter, year, etc. It’s calculated as the sales over a period divided by the average accounts receivables balance over the same period. It’s calculated as follows:
ARTR = Net Credit Sales / Average Accounts Receivable
Net Credit Sales = Sales on Credit – Sales Returns – Sales Allowances
Average Accounts Receivable = (Starting + Ending A/R Over a Fixed Time) / 2
The higher the ratio, the less friction businesses have in converting their accounts receivables into cash. One important consideration to keep in mind is that if total sales are used for this calculation, which some business do, the results don’t reflect the original formula because it doesn’t remove the sales on credit or sales allowances.
Days Sales Outstanding (DSO)
This metric reveals how fast (in average number of days) a company is able to turn its receivables into cash. It’s the average accounts receivables divided by net credit sales multiplied by 365. It’s calculated as follows:
DSO = (A/R / net credit sales) x 365 days
The lower the DSO, the better quality and the more efficient a company is in converting its accounts receivables into cash. The higher the DSO, and especially when it goes beyond 90 days, can represent two different financial measures. The first is that the business’ accounts receivables might not be collectable. The second is that the company might be able to make sales but with deteriorating earnings.
While there are many ways to analyze a company’s health, along with many ways to analyze the quality of existing and future accounts receivables, these are a few ways to evaluate a company’s present financial health and prospects for the future.
Sources
https://www.uschamber.com/sbindex/key-findings
How to Measure the Quality of Accounts Receivable
October 1, 2024 · Blog, General Business News, Uncategorized
⏱ 4 min read
Analyzing a company’s Accounts Receivables is an effective way to measure its current cash flows and the likelihood of maintaining healthy cash flows. According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Small Business Index (Third Quarter 2024), 68 percent of small business owners reported being content with their third quarter cash flow performance. This illustrates the importance for small business owners to do everything possible to maintain healthy cash flows, including evaluating the quality of accounts receivables (A/R).
Defining Accounts Receivables
This account or line item on the balance sheet gives the business’ managers/owners and investors a measure on how much money a business expects to receive from selling goods or services. It’s an important metric because it’s a measure of what’s owed, but not yet collected from rendered services/goods.
Consideration for Uncollectable Accounts Receivables
While businesses hope to collect 100 percent of their A/Rs, businesses take a realistic view that not everyone will pay up. For whatever reason, A/Rs aren’t always collected and must be accounted for as uncollectable. Therefore, a contra account is setup to account for accounts receivables that turn into bad debt. This contra account is linked to the accounts receivable, an asset reported on the balance sheet, offsetting the accounts receivable balance. However, there are many metrics for companies to manage their health internally, and some of these metrics are discussed below.
Accounts Receivable-to-Sales Ratio
This is determined by taking a “snapshot” of the ratio or division of the accounts receivables divided by sales over a period of time. The resulting calculation is the percentage of a business’ unpaid sales. The higher the accounts receivable-to-sales ratio, the riskier the company’s financial health. It indicates a business has accounts receivables with a low likelihood of being collected. It’s calculated as follows:
AR to Sales = AR / Sales
Since it measures the mix of how much a business relies on cash versus credit, it can prompt an analyst to determine whether a company is able to operate on minimal cash with low fixed costs and limited outstanding debt. It can also prompt an analyst to determine if a company is subject to cyclical sales and is dependent on the business cycle and whether it’s the right time to invest in a company or hold off until a better entry point is established.
Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio
This calculation determines how fast a business can convert its accounts receivables into cash. It calculates this over a discrete period, be it a month, quarter, year, etc. It’s calculated as the sales over a period divided by the average accounts receivables balance over the same period. It’s calculated as follows:
ARTR = Net Credit Sales / Average Accounts Receivable
Net Credit Sales = Sales on Credit – Sales Returns – Sales Allowances
Average Accounts Receivable = (Starting + Ending A/R Over a Fixed Time) / 2
The higher the ratio, the less friction businesses have in converting their accounts receivables into cash. One important consideration to keep in mind is that if total sales are used for this calculation, which some business do, the results don’t reflect the original formula because it doesn’t remove the sales on credit or sales allowances.
Days Sales Outstanding (DSO)
This metric reveals how fast (in average number of days) a company is able to turn its receivables into cash. It’s the average accounts receivables divided by net credit sales multiplied by 365. It’s calculated as follows:
DSO = (A/R / net credit sales) x 365 days
The lower the DSO, the better quality and the more efficient a company is in converting its accounts receivables into cash. The higher the DSO, and especially when it goes beyond 90 days, can represent two different financial measures. The first is that the business’ accounts receivables might not be collectable. The second is that the company might be able to make sales but with deteriorating earnings.
While there are many ways to analyze a company’s health, along with many ways to analyze the quality of existing and future accounts receivables, these are a few ways to evaluate a company’s present financial health and prospects for the future.
Sources
https://www.uschamber.com/sbindex/key-findings
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
Planning for healthcare in retirement is a tricky business. Some hardcore smokers live past 100, while some hardcore exercise and fitness gurus drop dead in their sixties. You just don’t know – which is why you need a plan.
Medicare
Once you turn 65, Medicare is available to most Americans. The problem is deciding what type of Medicare plan to purchase. Here is an overview:
Medicare Part A – This plan covers hospital stays, skilled nursing, hospice and some home health services. It is free for eligible beneficiaries but caps some benefit coverage and requires a deductible for each inpatient hospital stay. When a hospital stay is longer than 60 days, you’re required to pay a per-day rate – and that can add up.
Medicare Part B – This plan does charge a premium, and you have to buy it in concert with Part A. Part B covers doctor visits, preventive care, screenings, treatments, and medical equipment. It does not cover dental, vision, or hearing care and only pays for procedures deemed medically necessary. This plan also features a much lower deductible than Part A, but beneficiaries are responsible for 20 percent of covered services after the deductible.
Collectively, Parts A and B are what’s known as Original Medicare.
Medicare Part C – This plan is more commonly known as Medicare Advantage (MA). It is a paid alternative that combines coverage from Part A and B, plus offers add-on options for drug coverage, dental, vision, long-term care, etc. Plans vary significantly by insurer and may include any combination of deductibles, copayments, and coinsurance.
Medicare Part D – This plan offers coverage for prescription drugs. It charges a premium determined by your income, and deductibles, copayments, and coinsurance vary by plan. You have the option to purchase a standalone Part D plan when you enroll in Original Medicare.
Medigap – Also known as a Medicare Supplement Plan, this policy is a good idea whether you go for Original Medicare or an MA plan. That’s because it offers coverage for a lot of the gaps in those plans that generate high out-of-pocket expenses, including deductibles and coinsurance.
Long-Term Care
Among Americans who live past age 64, more than two out of three (70 percent) will at some point need long-term care. Whether you hire paid caregivers or move into a long-term care (LTC) residence, the cost of services currently averages between $60,000 and $100,000 a year in the United States. One of the biggest determinants of cost depends on whether you can get by with limited hours of help a day or need full 24-hour care. Note that for those with mobility issues (i.e., they cannot get to and from the toilet by themselves), 24-hour care is more likely.
Long-term care insurance (LTCi) can help you pay for this type of care so that you don’t deplete your savings quickly. This is especially important for couples, in which one spouse may need to enter an LTC residence while the other lives at home, with all the expenses that it entails.
The best time to buy LTC insurance is while you’re still healthy, as it is medically underwritten. The “sweet spot” is around age 55, but anytime in your mid-50s to early 60s is ideal. In most cases, policies are more expensive for women than men because women tend to live longer.
Caveats to Consider
Policies typically pay out a limited daily amount, which may not cover the full cost.
Policies typically pay out only for a limited period (e.g., 3 to 7 years)
A policy may have a lifetime amount cap
All this is to say that you may purchase a generous LTCi policy, but if you outlive its limits, you will need to use your own money to pay for caregiving and/or rely on Medicaid when you run out of funds.
Hybrid Insurance
The biggest risk to purchasing an LTC policy is that you may never need it. Some policies offer a form of premium return, but like most insurance policies, LTCi generally uses it or loses it. To avoid this scenario, another option is to purchase a life + LTC insurance plan – also known as a hybrid policy. It provides a certain amount of life insurance upon death. However, if you need long-term care before you pass away, the policy will allow you to tap that death benefit amount to pay for it. This allows you to use the coverage either for LTC or as a life insurance payout for your beneficiaries.
Plan For These Expenses Now
While everyone is usually thinking about how to pay for household expenses, travel excursions, or a second home in retirement – they often don’t think about a health plan. As you can see, Medicare doesn’t cover everything and those expenses can add up, especially for people who live a long time.
But if you start planning long before retirement, you can contribute to an earmarked account that builds over time and uses that money to pay for medical expenses. The Health Savings Account (HSA) requires enrollment in a high-deductible health plan, whether offered by an employer or purchased on your own. Contributions made to an HSA are tax-free (which reduces taxable income), and the funds can be invested for tax-free growth in a variety of investment options. Withdrawals are also tax-free as long as they are used to pay for eligible healthcare products and services.
Note that HSA proceeds are your money, no matter what. It differs from employer-sponsored accounts such as an HRA (health reimbursement account) or an FSA (flexible savings account) because you have only a limited time to use those funds – then they revert back to the employer. In other words, you can’t access that money once you retire.
Pre-Retirement Planning Guide Health Plan
September 1, 2024 · Blog, Financial Planning, Uncategorized
⏱ 5 min read
Step 4: Putting Together a Health Plan
Planning for healthcare in retirement is a tricky business. Some hardcore smokers live past 100, while some hardcore exercise and fitness gurus drop dead in their sixties. You just don’t know – which is why you need a plan.
Medicare
Once you turn 65, Medicare is available to most Americans. The problem is deciding what type of Medicare plan to purchase. Here is an overview:
Medicare Part A – This plan covers hospital stays, skilled nursing, hospice and some home health services. It is free for eligible beneficiaries but caps some benefit coverage and requires a deductible for each inpatient hospital stay. When a hospital stay is longer than 60 days, you’re required to pay a per-day rate – and that can add up.
Medicare Part B – This plan does charge a premium, and you have to buy it in concert with Part A. Part B covers doctor visits, preventive care, screenings, treatments, and medical equipment. It does not cover dental, vision, or hearing care and only pays for procedures deemed medically necessary. This plan also features a much lower deductible than Part A, but beneficiaries are responsible for 20 percent of covered services after the deductible.
Collectively, Parts A and B are what’s known as Original Medicare.
Medicare Part C – This plan is more commonly known as Medicare Advantage (MA). It is a paid alternative that combines coverage from Part A and B, plus offers add-on options for drug coverage, dental, vision, long-term care, etc. Plans vary significantly by insurer and may include any combination of deductibles, copayments, and coinsurance.
Medicare Part D – This plan offers coverage for prescription drugs. It charges a premium determined by your income, and deductibles, copayments, and coinsurance vary by plan. You have the option to purchase a standalone Part D plan when you enroll in Original Medicare.
Medigap – Also known as a Medicare Supplement Plan, this policy is a good idea whether you go for Original Medicare or an MA plan. That’s because it offers coverage for a lot of the gaps in those plans that generate high out-of-pocket expenses, including deductibles and coinsurance.
Long-Term Care
Among Americans who live past age 64, more than two out of three (70 percent) will at some point need long-term care. Whether you hire paid caregivers or move into a long-term care (LTC) residence, the cost of services currently averages between $60,000 and $100,000 a year in the United States. One of the biggest determinants of cost depends on whether you can get by with limited hours of help a day or need full 24-hour care. Note that for those with mobility issues (i.e., they cannot get to and from the toilet by themselves), 24-hour care is more likely.
Long-term care insurance (LTCi) can help you pay for this type of care so that you don’t deplete your savings quickly. This is especially important for couples, in which one spouse may need to enter an LTC residence while the other lives at home, with all the expenses that it entails.
The best time to buy LTC insurance is while you’re still healthy, as it is medically underwritten. The “sweet spot” is around age 55, but anytime in your mid-50s to early 60s is ideal. In most cases, policies are more expensive for women than men because women tend to live longer.
Caveats to Consider
Policies typically pay out a limited daily amount, which may not cover the full cost.
Policies typically pay out only for a limited period (e.g., 3 to 7 years)
A policy may have a lifetime amount cap
All this is to say that you may purchase a generous LTCi policy, but if you outlive its limits, you will need to use your own money to pay for caregiving and/or rely on Medicaid when you run out of funds.
Hybrid Insurance
The biggest risk to purchasing an LTC policy is that you may never need it. Some policies offer a form of premium return, but like most insurance policies, LTCi generally uses it or loses it. To avoid this scenario, another option is to purchase a life + LTC insurance plan – also known as a hybrid policy. It provides a certain amount of life insurance upon death. However, if you need long-term care before you pass away, the policy will allow you to tap that death benefit amount to pay for it. This allows you to use the coverage either for LTC or as a life insurance payout for your beneficiaries.
Plan For These Expenses Now
While everyone is usually thinking about how to pay for household expenses, travel excursions, or a second home in retirement – they often don’t think about a health plan. As you can see, Medicare doesn’t cover everything and those expenses can add up, especially for people who live a long time.
But if you start planning long before retirement, you can contribute to an earmarked account that builds over time and uses that money to pay for medical expenses. The Health Savings Account (HSA) requires enrollment in a high-deductible health plan, whether offered by an employer or purchased on your own. Contributions made to an HSA are tax-free (which reduces taxable income), and the funds can be invested for tax-free growth in a variety of investment options. Withdrawals are also tax-free as long as they are used to pay for eligible healthcare products and services.
Note that HSA proceeds are your money, no matter what. It differs from employer-sponsored accounts such as an HRA (health reimbursement account) or an FSA (flexible savings account) because you have only a limited time to use those funds – then they revert back to the employer. In other words, you can’t access that money once you retire.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
According to EY, the convertible debt market saw whipsaw action in issuances. Between 2015 and 2019, average issuance varied between $40 billion and $45 billion. However, it dropped to $22 billion in 2022 but re-accelerated to $52 billion in 2023. While the levels of issuance varied, the way this type of debt is accounted for has remained much calmer.
Defining a Convertible Bond
A convertible bond is a type of debt security that gives the investor the right to exchange the bond, at certain milestones, for a pre-determined percentage of equity in the issuing company. This investment vehicle has both equity and debt features.
Since this type of investment gives investors the potential for equity conversion into a company, the debt/bond side of it may present investors with a nominal coupon remittance or a potentially zero-coupon payment. However, there are important accounting considerations for this type of investment vehicle via generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
IFRS
When it comes to IFRS, convertible bonds are considered blended securities because they are partially debt and partially equity. The debt piece is accounted for by discounting the principal and interest paid out to the bondholder at the company’s cost of straight debt. The following example illustrates how it’s calculated:
The business presents a 10-year, $250 million convertible bond, providing investors with a 2.5 percent coupon rate and a 9.5 percent straight cost of debt. Based on discounting these variables, the present value of the principal and coupon payments is: $182,805,096 (assuming end-of-year, annual coupons). To determine the equity proportion, we must take $250 million and subtract $182,805,096, which equals $67,194,904.
Looking at the journal entry, we have the following breakdown:
Looking at the interest expense this is calculated as follows:
The 9.5 percent (straight debt cost) is multiplied by the net present value of the beginning debt liability balance of the first year ($182,805,096), which is $17,366,484.12. Since there’s a coupon payment of (2.5 percent X $250,000,000 = $6,250,000), the difference between $17,366,484.12 and $6,250,000 = $11,116,484.12 should be “accreted” to the debt liability or the debt balance.
The journal entry would be as follows:
Debit: Interest Expense $17,366,484.12
Credit: Cash $6,250,000
Credit: Accretion of Debt Discount – Liability = $11,116,484.12
Now, if at the bond’s maturity, the investor is unable to convert the bond to equity according to the terms of the convertible note, the entire $250 million bond will be paid back to the investor. The journal entry will be as follows:
Debit: Convertible Debt $250,000,000
Credit: Cash $250,000,000
If, however, the investor of the convertible bond is favorable to it being exchanged, the journal entry will be as follows:
Debit: Convertible Debt $250,000,000
Credit: Share Capital – Shareholder’s Equity = $250,000,000
This explanation assumes that convertible bonds are only able to be converted into company equity. However, if the bond is cash-settled, there are alternate considerations. It’s also assumed that the bond is issued at year’s end and makes its coupon payments once a year.
GAAP
Under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), present standards treat it as straight debt. This accounting practice changed from GAAP’s previous treatment of bifurcating it, similar to IFRS’ current treatment.
At issuance, the journal entries are as follows:
Debit: Cash $250,000,000
Credit: Convertible Debt $250,000,000
With this accounting treatment, it’s recognized as an interest expense. Since this contrasts with IFRS, no accretion is required under GAAP. This assumes there are no additional debt issuance costs when calculating interest expenses. Therefore, assuming the same initial debt amount at par and the coupon rate for year one, it’s the rate for the debt issuance multiplied by the full debt amount ($250,000,000).
The journal entry is as follows:
Debit: Interest Expense $6,250,000
Credit: Cash $6,250,000
If the convertible debt doesn’t present a good opportunity for the investor, they’ll receive the principal back. The journal entry is as follows:
Debit: Convertible Debt $250,000,000
Credit: Cash $250,000,000
If, however, the convertible debt presents the investor with an opportunity to convert to equity, and it’s exercised, the journal entry is presented as follows:
Debit: Convertible Debt $250,000,000
Credit: Share Capital – Shareholder’s Equity $250,000,000
Conclusion
While these examples do not explore all the potential scenarios when accounting for convertible debt, they show what considerations accountants must keep in mind when analyzing a transaction.
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments
September 1, 2024 · Accounting News, Blog, Uncategorized
⏱ 4 min read
According to EY, the convertible debt market saw whipsaw action in issuances. Between 2015 and 2019, average issuance varied between $40 billion and $45 billion. However, it dropped to $22 billion in 2022 but re-accelerated to $52 billion in 2023. While the levels of issuance varied, the way this type of debt is accounted for has remained much calmer.
Defining a Convertible Bond
A convertible bond is a type of debt security that gives the investor the right to exchange the bond, at certain milestones, for a pre-determined percentage of equity in the issuing company. This investment vehicle has both equity and debt features.
Since this type of investment gives investors the potential for equity conversion into a company, the debt/bond side of it may present investors with a nominal coupon remittance or a potentially zero-coupon payment. However, there are important accounting considerations for this type of investment vehicle via generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
IFRS
When it comes to IFRS, convertible bonds are considered blended securities because they are partially debt and partially equity. The debt piece is accounted for by discounting the principal and interest paid out to the bondholder at the company’s cost of straight debt. The following example illustrates how it’s calculated:
The business presents a 10-year, $250 million convertible bond, providing investors with a 2.5 percent coupon rate and a 9.5 percent straight cost of debt. Based on discounting these variables, the present value of the principal and coupon payments is: $182,805,096 (assuming end-of-year, annual coupons). To determine the equity proportion, we must take $250 million and subtract $182,805,096, which equals $67,194,904.
Looking at the journal entry, we have the following breakdown:
Looking at the interest expense this is calculated as follows:
The 9.5 percent (straight debt cost) is multiplied by the net present value of the beginning debt liability balance of the first year ($182,805,096), which is $17,366,484.12. Since there’s a coupon payment of (2.5 percent X $250,000,000 = $6,250,000), the difference between $17,366,484.12 and $6,250,000 = $11,116,484.12 should be “accreted” to the debt liability or the debt balance.
The journal entry would be as follows:
Debit: Interest Expense $17,366,484.12
Credit: Cash $6,250,000
Credit: Accretion of Debt Discount – Liability = $11,116,484.12
Now, if at the bond’s maturity, the investor is unable to convert the bond to equity according to the terms of the convertible note, the entire $250 million bond will be paid back to the investor. The journal entry will be as follows:
Debit: Convertible Debt $250,000,000
Credit: Cash $250,000,000
If, however, the investor of the convertible bond is favorable to it being exchanged, the journal entry will be as follows:
Debit: Convertible Debt $250,000,000
Credit: Share Capital – Shareholder’s Equity = $250,000,000
This explanation assumes that convertible bonds are only able to be converted into company equity. However, if the bond is cash-settled, there are alternate considerations. It’s also assumed that the bond is issued at year’s end and makes its coupon payments once a year.
GAAP
Under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), present standards treat it as straight debt. This accounting practice changed from GAAP’s previous treatment of bifurcating it, similar to IFRS’ current treatment.
At issuance, the journal entries are as follows:
Debit: Cash $250,000,000
Credit: Convertible Debt $250,000,000
With this accounting treatment, it’s recognized as an interest expense. Since this contrasts with IFRS, no accretion is required under GAAP. This assumes there are no additional debt issuance costs when calculating interest expenses. Therefore, assuming the same initial debt amount at par and the coupon rate for year one, it’s the rate for the debt issuance multiplied by the full debt amount ($250,000,000).
The journal entry is as follows:
Debit: Interest Expense $6,250,000
Credit: Cash $6,250,000
If the convertible debt doesn’t present a good opportunity for the investor, they’ll receive the principal back. The journal entry is as follows:
Debit: Convertible Debt $250,000,000
Credit: Cash $250,000,000
If, however, the convertible debt presents the investor with an opportunity to convert to equity, and it’s exercised, the journal entry is presented as follows:
Debit: Convertible Debt $250,000,000
Credit: Share Capital – Shareholder’s Equity $250,000,000
Conclusion
While these examples do not explore all the potential scenarios when accounting for convertible debt, they show what considerations accountants must keep in mind when analyzing a transaction.
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.
Drafting a will is not something that people, for the most part, want to think about. But no one gets out of life alive. So, if you want to have a say in what happens to your property and assets after you’re gone, a will is a very smart idea. Here are a few specific reasons why having a will makes good sense.
Facilitates Probate
First, a definition: Probate is the legal procedure your estate goes through after you pass. During this process, a court will start the process of distributing your estate to those you designate. When you have a will, the probate process has a legal document as a guide, one the court uses that clearly defines your wishes. This way, there are fewer roadblocks. Things go a lot more smoothly.
Protects Your Estate
Now, if you don’t have a will, there’s no binding legal document that espouses what you want to do with your assets. Instead, the probate court will distribute your estate according to your state’s intestacy laws. There’s no guarantee that the state agrees with what you want.
Designates Who Gets What
This is one of the most important. If your family includes ex-spouses and/or estranged relatives, having a will helps prevent squabbles. An unhappy relative will think twice about protesting when you have a well-drafted will.
Disinherits People, Too
If you don’t have a will, again, probate courts will distribute your estate based on your state’s intestacy laws, which create a hierarchy of inheritance among your surviving family members. Because families – and life – can be messy, when you have a will, you can specify who doesn’t get parts of your estate. Better still, you can even specify certain people to receive your assets as beneficiaries, who aren’t necessarily relatives. When you’re this specific within a legal document, it can further safeguard your wishes.
Provides For Your Children and Pets
When you have a will, it gives you the power to decide who will care for your children if they’re minors when you pass. If you don’t decide, a court will appoint a guardian. It’s safe to say that most people don’t want this; you know your children best. Since pets are considered property and they can’t inherit, you can make sure your beloved furry family members are adopted by a person or organization that you know and trust.
Specifies the Executor and Administrator of Your Estate
You get to decide who these people are, though sometimes they can be the same person. Generally, their function is to make sure your beneficiaries receive the assets you’ve designated for them. Having these trusted people in place will give you peace of mind. When you don’t have these individuals in place, you give up the control you could have had.
Helps Minimize Estate Taxes
Yes, it’s true. Your family, should they inherit property from you after you’re gone, might have to pay taxes on it. That’s why it pays to look into estate planning tools. When you have a will, you can build these stipulations into it. Just ask your accountant and/or lawyer to help you navigate these waters. It’s well worth it.
These are just a few of the reasons you need a will. Probably the main reason is that tomorrow isn’t guaranteed. When you’re gone, you’ve missed your opportunity to legally draft your final desires. That’s why, when you’ve set up provisions for all the things you’ve worked so hard for and all the people you leave behind, it’s truly an act of love.
Sources
Top 10 Reasons to Have a Will (findlaw.com)
Executor vs. Administrator: What’s the Difference? – Policygenius
Probate – What Is Probate & How To Avoid It | Trust & Will (trustandwill.com)
7 Reasons You Need a Will
September 1, 2024 · Blog, Tip of the Month, Uncategorized
⏱ 4 min read
Drafting a will is not something that people, for the most part, want to think about. But no one gets out of life alive. So, if you want to have a say in what happens to your property and assets after you’re gone, a will is a very smart idea. Here are a few specific reasons why having a will makes good sense.
Facilitates Probate
First, a definition: Probate is the legal procedure your estate goes through after you pass. During this process, a court will start the process of distributing your estate to those you designate. When you have a will, the probate process has a legal document as a guide, one the court uses that clearly defines your wishes. This way, there are fewer roadblocks. Things go a lot more smoothly.
Protects Your Estate
Now, if you don’t have a will, there’s no binding legal document that espouses what you want to do with your assets. Instead, the probate court will distribute your estate according to your state’s intestacy laws. There’s no guarantee that the state agrees with what you want.
Designates Who Gets What
This is one of the most important. If your family includes ex-spouses and/or estranged relatives, having a will helps prevent squabbles. An unhappy relative will think twice about protesting when you have a well-drafted will.
Disinherits People, Too
If you don’t have a will, again, probate courts will distribute your estate based on your state’s intestacy laws, which create a hierarchy of inheritance among your surviving family members. Because families – and life – can be messy, when you have a will, you can specify who doesn’t get parts of your estate. Better still, you can even specify certain people to receive your assets as beneficiaries, who aren’t necessarily relatives. When you’re this specific within a legal document, it can further safeguard your wishes.
Provides For Your Children and Pets
When you have a will, it gives you the power to decide who will care for your children if they’re minors when you pass. If you don’t decide, a court will appoint a guardian. It’s safe to say that most people don’t want this; you know your children best. Since pets are considered property and they can’t inherit, you can make sure your beloved furry family members are adopted by a person or organization that you know and trust.
Specifies the Executor and Administrator of Your Estate
You get to decide who these people are, though sometimes they can be the same person. Generally, their function is to make sure your beneficiaries receive the assets you’ve designated for them. Having these trusted people in place will give you peace of mind. When you don’t have these individuals in place, you give up the control you could have had.
Helps Minimize Estate Taxes
Yes, it’s true. Your family, should they inherit property from you after you’re gone, might have to pay taxes on it. That’s why it pays to look into estate planning tools. When you have a will, you can build these stipulations into it. Just ask your accountant and/or lawyer to help you navigate these waters. It’s well worth it.
These are just a few of the reasons you need a will. Probably the main reason is that tomorrow isn’t guaranteed. When you’re gone, you’ve missed your opportunity to legally draft your final desires. That’s why, when you’ve set up provisions for all the things you’ve worked so hard for and all the people you leave behind, it’s truly an act of love.
Sources
Top 10 Reasons to Have a Will (findlaw.com)
Executor vs. Administrator: What’s the Difference? – Policygenius
Probate – What Is Probate & How To Avoid It | Trust & Will (trustandwill.com)
Disclaimer
These articles provide general information on tax, accounting, and financial topics for small businesses and individuals. They are educational in nature and are not specific legal, accounting, financial, tax, or other professional advice, and should not be relied upon as such. This content was prepared by Service2Client and may have been reviewed or edited by the website owner for accuracy and compliance. Look for a trust mark below for verification details. No representation is made that any approach described will achieve a particular result, and no regulatory or professional body has reviewed or endorsed this content. Because each situation is different, readers should consult a qualified professional about their specific circumstances before acting. Images accompanying these articles are protected by copyright and may not be copied or reused.