Blog Archives - Page 12 of 60

October 1, 2025

Enhancing Homebuyer Protections, Wildfire Risks, 911 Response and Domestic Manufacturing

Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act (HR 2808) – Introduced by Rep. John Rose (R-TN) on April 10, the House passed this bill on June 23, and the Senate passed it on Aug. 2. Signed into law on Sept. 5, this bipartisan bill prohibits a consumer reporting agency from selling a mortgage applicant’s personal information to other lenders without their explicit consent. The legislation is designed to safeguard homebuyers’ personal financial information and eliminate the frequent bombardment of other lender marketing offers during the financing process underway with the applicant’s existing lender.

SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Reauthorization Act of 2025 (HR 2483) – This bill renews billions of dollars in federal funding for programs responsible for preventing overdoses and further strengthening treatment and recovery services. The renewal of funds to nationwide county programs is timely, given the current behavioral health and substance abuse disorder crises. The bill was introduced by Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-KY) on March 31, passed in the House on June 4 and in the Senate on Sept. 18; it currently awaits signature by the president.

TRAVEL Act of 2025 (HR 3400) – Also known as the Territorial Response and Access to Veterans’ Essential Lifecare Act, the purpose of this bill is to enable VA physicians and specialists to travel to hard-to-reach areas in U.S. territories for up to one year. The Act is designed to help fill critical gaps in VA medical services across the Pacific territories by compensating providers with travel bonuses. The legislation was introduced by Representative Kimberlyn King-Hinds (R-Northern Mariana Islands) on May 14. It passed in the House on Sept. 15 and currently lies with the Senate.

Fire Ready Nation Act of 2025 (S 306) – Introduced by Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) on Jan. 29, this legislation would establish a fire weather program at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The new program would enable scientists to better predict wildfires, fire weather, and fire risk via forecasting, detection, and modeling, as well as respond quickly to prevent devastation to families, homes, and businesses due to wildfires. The legislation was passed in the Senate on Sept. 10 and is now under review in the House.

Enhancing First Response Act (S 725) – This bill was introduced on Feb. 25 by Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and passed in the Senate on Sept. 10. The law would reclassify 911 dispatchers as public safety workers from their current role as office and administrative support in the federal Standard Occupational Classification system. In addition, the bill contains provisions to improve access to the 911 call system during major disasters and make the system more resilient against outages and disruptions. The fate of this bipartisan bill now rests in the House.

National Manufacturing Advisory Council Act (S 433) – This Act was introduced by Sen. Gary Peters (D-MI) on Feb. 5. It seeks to establish a working group of representatives from industry, labor, and academia to advise Congress on policies and programs to enhance domestic manufacturing despite the challenges of global competition, U.S. supply chain issues, and the current tariff solution. The bipartisan legislationwas passed unanimously in the Senate on July 14 and is currently under review in the House.

October 1, 2025

Ideas for Small Business Succession Planning

It can be hard to build up your own business, but it can be harder to sell it for what it’s worth. In fact, only around three in 10 family-owned businesses survive for the next generation. Whether family-owned or in a partnership of non-family owners, business succession is no easy feat.

Succession Planning

It is very important to have a succession plan, even if the business is fairly new. That’s because it gives heirs a roadmap for what to do if the owner dies unexpectedly. The first step is to figure out who you want to run the business after you. If you want to pass it on to one or more family members, be sure to ask if they’d like to own it. Note that the family route may need to be considered a year or more before the transfer to ensure the successive owner has time to learn the ropes.

If you decide to sell the business to a third party, consider if you want to sell it outright or retain partial ownership and continue to get a share of the profits. Also, think about whether or not you want to participate in running the business once ownership changes hands.

Business Owner Partners

In the case of a shared business, a succession plan can help clarify the intent of both owners and provide a legal path of succession if one owner dies. In a worst-case scenario, instead of the surviving partner taking the reins to run the business on his own, he may end up having to run it alongside the deceased owner’s spouse, who might not possess the skills, experience, or proclivity for the business. Or maybe the surviving spouse decides not to sell the business but receive a share of the profits without doing any work.

Key Man Insurance

If the surviving owner would simply like to buy out the deceased owner’s interest in the business, there are certain financial strategies available in the event he doesn’t have the assets to do so. One vehicle is called key man insurance, which refers to policies paid for by the business to cover the death of the business owner. Death proceeds are specifically earmarked to keep the business operating upon the death of the owner.

Buy-Sell Agreement with Life Insurance

A succession plan that includes a Buy-Sell Agreement contract specifies what will happen to the business shares of the owner upon his death. In most cases, the surviving business partner will use the life insurance proceeds to buy the shares at a predetermined value, which ensures that the deceased’s family is adequately paid for his share of the business upon his death.

Family-Owned Business

In the case of a family-owned business, a family member who is active in the business may take out an insurance policy on the owner and use the proceeds to buy out the interests of the non-active family members after the owner dies.

Private Annuity

Another option is a private annuity, in which the owner sells his business to his children in exchange for a fixed annuity income, based on IRS interest rates, for the rest of the owner’s life and, if elected, that of his spouse. If the owner outlives his life expectancy, the children may end up paying him more than the business is worth. However, if the owner dies sooner, they may pay less than the business is worth.

Family Limited Partnership

With a family limited partnership, the business owner transfers some or all of his business to individual family members while he is alive. When the owner dies, the portion of the business that has been transferred is no longer considered a part of the owner’s estate and is therefore not subject to estate taxes.

Seller Financing

If the owner has trouble selling the business to a third party, including perhaps a valuable employee who would like to take over, consider a seller financing agreement. Instead of paying the owner a lump sum, the buyer pays him a fixed, regular payment over a set number of years. Future business revenue secures the note, and the current owner would be qualified to know how well business revenues might hold up under the new ownership. Some sellers set up a finance agreement for just five years or so, after which time the buyer is expected to qualify to refinance with a conventional loan. It’s also possible for the financier to sell the new owner’s note if he decides down the road to get out of the financing role. The good news is that, should the buyer default on the loan, the seller would still own the company.

September 1, 2025

Capitalizing Versus Expensing Research and Development

Based on statistics from the World Bank, the United States government spent 3.59 percent of its 2022 gross domestic product on research and development. While private businesses spend on their own research and development costs, it’s important for businesses to treat these expenditures appropriately.

When it comes to research and development outlays, U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) dictate that businesses must expense them during the identical fiscal year as they’re consumed. Accordingly, this creates difficulties for investors and business owners alike in two ways. The first is more uncertain profitability and loss projections. The second is a murkier ability to quantify their rates of return on assets and investments.

If R&D capitalization is minimal or non-existent by a company, it can imply the business’ total assets (or its total invested capital) doesn’t accurately represent how much has been put into such assets. This will affect the business’ Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Invested Capital (ROIC). This illustrates the importance in differences of how businesses treat their R&D expenses – using the balance sheet to capitalize and the income statement to expense.

Accounting Standards

Per International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), research outlays are classified as expenses annually, like GAAP. However, development costs may be capitalized for businesses with assets under incubation for saleable purposes (in other words, the tech/IP is expected to be approved and produce revenue in the future).

One consideration with IFRS is that a portion of research and development costs may be capitalized or recorded as an asset on the business’ balance sheet, instead of classified as an expense on the Profit and Loss Statement. It’s important, though, to understand that judgment is in the eye of the classification as to how commercially viable a product or service will be in the future, potentially causing issues on the company’s financial statements. Since research and development is sporadic, it impacts a business’ profitability. It’s seen in certain sectors, such as consumer discretionary, healthcare, and technology, to highlight a few.

With revenue, cash flow, and profit expected from the long-term investment of research and development, for products or services with a realistic chance, it should be capitalized and not expensed. Investors need to be aware of the differences in how businesses capitalize or expense their research and development spending, since, without additional financial analysis, it’s important to factor in research and development equally. This is because companies that don’t capitalize experience more unstable earnings.

Exploring Capitalization Versus Expensing

To determine the value and to capitalize such assets, analysts must project the asset’s lifespan to produce benefits (over its economic life) and go with that projection for the amortization period.

Amortization life varies between assets and is based on the economic life of the particular asset. Ways to determine the economic life depend on both the asset’s patentability and/or salability. If there’s a pharmaceutical drug with a 20-year patent, it’ll likely have a much longer life than the next mobile device or graphic processing unit (GPU).

Assuming an asset has a life of six years, the business would amortize equally over the six-year time frame. There can be a multitude of amortization approaches, but the straight-line method is used for the capitalized research and development expenses. It assumes the following figures:

$200,000 spent on R&D

$40,000 residual value

Based on the difference of $160,000 and the six-year economic life, each year would result in approximately $26,666 in amortization expense. After six years, the resulting value would be $40,000 in residual value.

Conclusion

Understanding the importance of accounting for R&D outlays is helpful for businesses to maximize investments for competitiveness and financial compliance.

September 1, 2025

5 Myths About Life Insurance

Life insurance is something most of us don’t want to talk about. But the truth is, no one gets out of life alive. So, it might make sense to face it now so that when you really need it, it’s there. Before you start looking for a life insurance policy, let’s dispel some of the untruths you might have heard.

Myth #1: It’s too expensive. According to a recent survey by Life Insurance Marketing and Research Association (LIMRA), 52 percent of people thought it was too expensive to have or get more of. And how did they come to this conclusion? They based this on their “gut instinct,” or a “wild guess.” Truth is, it’s more affordable than you think and varies from person to person. In fact, the estimated yearly cost of a $500,000, 30-year term insurance policy for a healthy 30-year-old, non-smoking female is $316.

Myth #2: It’s a pain to apply. Not true. Thanks to the pandemic, which caused us to eliminate or reduce human interactions (like getting a doctor’s exam for term policies), you can apply online. These days, all you have to do is answer a few questions on your phone. Easy peasy.

Myth #3: My company’s policy is enough. Maybe. The coverage you have might not be enough for your family. Here are some facts. The median workplace life insurance coverage is either just a flat sum of $20,000 or one year’s salary.Of U.S. households that rely on workplace life insurance coverage, 44 percent say their families would struggle financially in less than six months should a wage earner die unexpectedly. So, what to do? A simple guideline is this: Aim for 10 to 12 times your annual salary and bonus, but people who are younger (farther away from retirement) might need more. Folks closer to retirement might need less.

Myth #4: I only need coverage if I’m working. If you’re not employed outside the home – like if you’re a stay-at-home mom – it’s still important to consider life insurance. Typically, life insurance is considered a replacement for lost income. If something happens to the non-breadwinner, it could also be necessary to pay for childcare and household work in your absence. The most important thing is to plan your coverage together with your family in mind so that you’re both in the best position possible should one of you pass away.

Myth #5: I don’t need life insurance until I’m older or become a parent. Nope. In fact, not only do you not have to be a parent, but your beneficiary could also be your partner or anyone else who relies on you. And you can change your beneficiaries (you can have more than one), should things change. Plus, if you apply for life insurance earlier in life, you’ll save money on premiums. Why? Because one thing that factors into how much you pay – or qualify for coverage at all – is your health. As you get older, your risk for developing health issues increases. According to LIMRA, 40 percent of those who have policies wish they’d bought them when they were younger.

In the end, you’ll want to take care of those who depend on you – and those you love. That’s why knowing the truth about life insurance matters.

Sources

Myths about life insurance | Fidelity

September 1, 2025

How to Reduce the Burden of IRA Required Minimum Distributions

Required minimum distributions (RMDs) from traditional IRAs and 401(k)s often become a significant tax burden during retirement. As the percentage of your IRA that must be distributed increases each year, many retirees face higher adjusted gross income and increased exposure to stealth taxes. However, with strategic planning, you can transform RMDs from burdens into opportunities.

Timing Your First RMD

The RMD starting age has changed recently: age 72 for those born before 1951, age 73 for those born 1951-1959, and age 75 for those born in 1960 or later. Your first RMD must be taken by April 1 of the year following when you reach the required age.

While you can delay your first RMD until early the following year, most taxpayers should take it in the year they reach the required age. Delaying means you’ll take two RMDs in one calendar year – your delayed first RMD plus that year’s current RMD – potentially pushing you into higher tax brackets and increasing stealth taxes.

Managing Multiple IRAs

If you own several traditional IRAs, you have valuable flexibility under the aggregation rules. First, calculate the RMD for each IRA separately. Then, you can either take distributions from each IRA individually or combine all RMDs and withdraw the total amount from your IRAs in any ratio you choose, even taking the entire amount from just one account.

This flexibility allows you to rebalance your portfolio, draw down smaller accounts, or meet other financial goals. Just ensure that by December 31, your total distributions equal or exceed the aggregate RMD. Note that inherited IRAs and employer plans like 401(k)s cannot be aggregated and must have their RMDs calculated and taken separately.

Charitable Giving Strategy

One of the most tax-efficient strategies is using qualified charitable distributions (QCDs). If you’re over 70½ and make charitable gifts, taking your RMD as a QCD can reduce your taxable income while satisfying the distribution requirement. This strategy often provides better tax benefits than taking a distribution and then making a separate charitable deduction.

Account Structure Optimization

The tax law allows you to consolidate or split IRAs without tax consequences using direct trustee-to-trustee transfers. Some people prefer multiple IRAs for beneficiary planning, different investment strategies or to keep 401(k) rollover money separate. Others find multiple accounts harder to manage and worry about unequal performance affecting beneficiaries differently.

Consider your specific situation: if you have a qualified longevity annuity contract (QLAC) that delays RMDs until age 85, managing it in a separate IRA might be easier.

In-Kind Distributions

You don’t need to sell assets to generate cash for RMDs. Instead, you can make in-kind distributions by transferring securities directly from your IRA to a taxable account. This preserves your asset allocation and can be particularly advantageous when assets have temporarily declined in value.

With in-kind distributions, the asset’s value on the distribution date becomes your new tax basis. If you believe a depressed asset will recover, distributing it allows the ordinary income tax on the current low value while future appreciation becomes tax-advantaged long-term capital gains. This strategy is also helpful for unconventional assets like real estate or small business interests that are difficult to sell in portions.

Distribution Timing and Amount

You can take RMDs anytime during the year. Some prefer monthly distributions for regular cash flow, others take distributions early to ensure compliance, and some wait until year-end to maximize tax deferral and delay estimated tax payments.

Remember that RMDs are minimums – you can always take more. Consider larger distributions in years when your tax rate is unusually low due to higher deductions or lower income. This reduces future RMDs when your tax rate might be higher.

Conclusion

Strategic RMD planning can significantly reduce their tax impact. By understanding timing options, leveraging aggregation rules, using charitable strategies, optimizing account structures, considering in-kind distributions and timing distributions strategically, you can turn required distributions into opportunities for smart tax and retirement planning.