Category: Accounting News

Working capital is the difference between a business’ current assets and liabilities. Negative working capital can happen when a business’ current assets are below its current liabilities. Therefore, working Capital = Accounts Receivable + Inventory – Accounts Payable. It’s a way to measure a company’s ability to meet short-term liabilities, such as managing inventory, satisfying vendor bills, etc., and how well its longer-term investments are implemented.

When a business has a surplus of current assets against its current liabilities, it’s said to have positive working capital. Generally speaking, when it’s positive, the business is able to service liabilities over the next 12 months, putting it in a good financial position. However, it’s important to understand how positive working capital is comprised. If a business has a sizeable outstanding accounts receivable account or has too much inventory, the company’s resources are not utilized efficiently. With money tied up in such areas and not financed by short-term liabilities, but with long-term capital, the long-term capital can’t be used for long-term investments.  

When working capital is either even or negative, it’s a way to gauge how (in)efficiently a business handles near-term financial obligations. Reasons why negative working capital exists include a business making one-time cash payments due to a business’ current assets markedly dropping. Similarly, current liabilities can increase massively with more accounts payable and increasing credit.

Delving into Negative Working Capital

When analyzing negative working capital, it’s important to see how it’s connected to the current ratio. The current ratio is a business’ current assets divided by its current liabilities. When the current ratio’s calculation is less than 1.0, the business has more current liabilities than current assets, resulting in negative working capital.

Temporary negative working capital may exist when a company spends excessively or sees a steep increase in outstanding bills due to buying input materials and services from its suppliers. Though extended periods of negative working capital could be a red flag because the business might have a problem paying immediate bills and is being forced to depend on financing or raising funds via equity issuances to manage its working capital, it gives insight into the company’s financial barometer.

Negative Working Capital Requires Judgment

Depending on the type of business and its working capital levels, a negative working capital figure may or may not indicate there’s a concern. Retail, grocery, and subscription negative working capital may not be bad; however, for capital-intensive companies, negative working capital might indicate trouble. One way to measure working-level capital is through the Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC). The CCC determines whether negative working capital is from efficient operations or cash flow constraints.

It looks at:

1. Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO) or how long the inventory waits before a sale is made.

2. Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) or how long before an invoice is paid to the company.

3. Days Payable Outstanding (DPO) or how many days it takes a company to pay its vendors’ invoices.

Where: CCC = DIO + DSO – DPO

If the resulting number from the CCC is negative, it indicates the company is receiving payments from its customers well before it needs to pay vendors/suppliers. A company with this type of result is in good shape financially. However, if the CCC is positive and meets some of the criteria, it would require further investigation to see if the negative working capital is worrisome. Examples of a company’s poor operation include higher accounts payable days, turnover slows, falling revenue, and accounts receivable collection timeframes increasing.

Conclusion

When it comes to working capital, it requires analysis as to why a company’s working capital level is at the level it is. Taking the level at face value doesn’t give the evaluator the full picture.

Whether it’s maintaining compliance with accounting standards or ensuring asset values are not overvalued for internal stakeholders or external existing or potential new investors, looking at net realizable value (NRV) is an important concept to understand and discuss how it’s implemented.

Defining NRV

Net realizable value examines what an asset can be sold for after accounting for selling or disposal costs. This results in the final value of inventory or accounts receivable. Used by both the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), it embodies the concept of accounting conservatism that compares NRV to the inventory’s cost. This notion leads accountants to value assets to produce lower profits and not overvalue assets when expert analysis is mandated for the deal review.

NRV is used in the lower-cost or market method of accounting reporting. The market method reporting approach requires a business’ inventory must be reported on the balance sheet at a lower value than either the historical cost or the market value. If there’s no known market value of the inventory, the NRV value can be used to approximate the market value.  

Calculating NRV

Step 1: The asset’s projected selling price or market value must be determined.

Step 2: The manufacturing and sales expenses connected with the asset must be determined. This also includes advertising and conveyance fees, for example, when factoring in costs.

Step 3: Determine the gap between the asset’s projected asking amount and the fees the company incurs to finish the goods and sell it.

This is calculated via the following formula:

NRV = Expected Selling Price – Total Production and Selling Costs

If a company is looking to sell a percentage of its inventory, it needs to figure out the NRV of the inventory that will be sold.

Assuming the selling price is $10,000, it needs to spend $1,500 on finishing costs and another $750 in transportation expenses. Therefore, NRV is calculated as follows:

NRV = $10,000 – ($1,500 + $750) = $7,750

When it comes to valuing current assets such as accounts receivable (AR), this approach can similarly determine the NRV of the unpaid invoices from their clients. This is accomplished by summing their ARs and then subtracting the uncollectible accounts. For example, if there’s $100,000 in outstanding invoices, but $20,000 is uncollectible due to clients’ inability to pay or otherwise cannot be collected. In this type of calculation, instead of determining the production and sales amounts, a business’ allowance for doubtful accounts is substituted. 

Conclusion

While these calculations assist investors and business owners in determining accurate costs of current assets, there are some considerations. For example, in periods of inflation or deflation, businesses must continually evaluate the net amount of the resulting calculation instead of the gross figures. Along with the increased and continual updating of NRVs, since the future price discovery of asset prices is unknown, there’s always room for uncertainty, which investors are constantly trying to determine how efficiently the market is presently pricing things.

While NRV is a single type of calculation, it’s an important one that can help businesses make the most of their inventory, accounts receivable, and similar accounting entries.

Bad debt expense is an important concept that businesses must account for when it comes to their financial reporting. Regardless of the timeframe a company accounts for, it helps companies determine what portion of their receivables are collectible and what portion are not – and therefore, a bad debt expense. Depending on the receivables’ amount, this bad debt expense can take the form of either the allowance method or the direct write-off method.

Direct Write-Off Method Explained

While a company can see its receivables increase quickly, collections of these receivables might not be possible in the future due to client defaults. The direct write-off method is recommended for accounts with nominal amounts in question. A company’s receivables account sees an immediate write-off with this method. This lowers a company’s revenue, reducing net income. When it comes to accounting for it properly, the journal entry for the direct write-off method is as follows:

Description: Uncollectible ABC Account

Therefore, the journal entry would debit $500 to the Bad Debt Expense and credit $500 to the Accounts Receivable for the ABC Account.

Allowance Method

When it comes to more substantive or material amounts, businesses are inclined to use the Allowance Method because it’s set up to interact well with contra asset accounts that offset accounts receivable. Reported on the balance sheet, a contra asset account has an opposite balance to accounts receivable, and the journal entry is as follows:

Assets

Cash: $500,000

Accounts receivable: $300,000

Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts: $25,000

Equipment: $200,000

Less Accumulated Depreciation: $5,000

Building: $100,000

Less Accumulated Depreciation: $15,000

Since there’s zero impact on income statement accounts, contra accounts are advantageous for companies to use since the revenues aren’t lowered from a direct loss that bad debt expenses can cause with other methods.

When it comes to the Allowance Method in action, the three components are as follows:

First Step: Assess the uncollectible receivables

This is done by either determining the percentage of sales or by the percentage of receivables.

Percentage of Sales Method

This is usually determined by taking a percentage of either net or total credit sales. It’s generally dictated by past trends (both internal and macro economy forecast). For example, 2 percent of $10,000,000 = $200,000.

Percentage of Receivables

This method works by looking at the aging schedule for receivables, including those that are due but not yet late. For example, the receivables that are not late but not yet paid can have a low percentage for the particular bucket. Each successive and later bucket of unpaid receivables would require a higher percentage estimated as uncollectible.

Second Step: Journal entries are notated by entering the bad debt expense as a debit and the allowance for doubtful accounts as a credit.

Third Step: After an account is considered permanently uncollectible, the last two entries are as follows:

Conclusion: The Importance of Calculating Bad Debt Expense

When it comes to determining a company’s results, it is required in their financial statements. If a company does not include this information, their assets could be inflated, potentially leading to overstating their net income. Calculating bad debt expense also helps companies determine which customers have defaulted on past bills, while at the same time highlighting customers that pay on time.

When it comes to accounting for bad debt expense, businesses that are experts at the two methods can effectively navigate the needs of internal and external audiences.

Depreciation can help a business realize tax benefits, maintain compliance with financial reporting requirements, and project asset replacement. The half-year convention for depreciation is an important practice to understand.

For fixed assets, depreciation is recognized and recorded on a 50 percent basis for the initial and concluding years over its schedule. This supposes that fixed assets have been in service for 50 percent of their initial calendar service year upon acquisition. It’s normally implemented by taxation agencies to limit the upper limits for depreciation attestations to 50 percent of the yearly figures.

The balance of the annual 50 percent depreciation amount is recognized/recorded during the depreciation schedule’s last year, as the fixed asset will be removed from service mid-year. Regardless of the type of depreciation – straight-line, double-declining, etc. – the half-year convention applies equally.

This has been instituted because businesses were tempted to buy fixed assets in the third or fourth quarter of a fiscal year and try to deduct it fully via complete depreciation deduction. However, this convention is explicit in that fixed assets in service on or after July 1 may only deduct half of otherwise normal depreciation schedules.

How It Works

In this example, Production Equipment is purchased for $50,000 on April 1, 2022, with a useful life of 7 years. Using the half-year convention, depreciation is as follows:

Straight-line Depreciations = Cost of Asset / Useful Life = $50,000 / 7 = $7,142.86

Half-Year Convention: $7,142.86 / 2 = $3,571.43

This also assumes that there’s no scrap of salvage value. Although there are 7 years for the item’s useful life, with the half-year convention, it’s treated as 8 years for the depreciation schedule:

Year 1: $3,571.43

Year 2: $7,142.86

Year 3: $7,142.86

Year 4: $7,142.86

Year 5: $7,142.86

Year 6: $7,142.86

Year 7: $7,142.86

Year 8: $3,571.43

Context for Depreciation Convention

A depreciation convention gives context on how depreciation is performed by the company. It guides the company on available depreciation methods based on the asset’s useful life, how much the asset can be depreciated once it’s removed from service, and how depreciation is accounted/claimed in the initial and final year during the asset’s recovery period.

Depending on the situation and the type of depreciation convention involved, the following are some different conventions and how they vary:

• Full Month permits a business to get a complete month of depreciation for the month when the asset has been put in service. There’s no depreciation taken for the month of disposal.
• Next Month permits a business to start recording depreciation for the fixed assets the following month and being able to record one month of depreciation “when disposed of.”
• Actual Days permits depreciation to be recorded for every single day an asset is in service during its fiscal year.
• Mid-Quarter permits depreciation for half of the 3-month business period whenever the asset’s been put in place and disposed of (for both quarters).

Conclusion

While this is illustrative of financial reporting requirements, it’s an important consideration for business owners and their accounting professionals. Optimizing fixed asset depreciation leads to more accurate books, which will help in tax planning.

When it comes to financial analysis, there are two metrics that internal stakeholders and external users, such as investors and analysts, can use to assist with analyzing a business’s operations.

Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) is used as part of a discount cash flow (DCF) calculation that aids in determining a company’s intrinsic value, helping investors make better informed decisions. This metric provides insight into how much cash flow is available to all funding claimants of the business (be it convertible bond investors, debt holders, and preferred and common stockholders). This is compared to free cash flow to equity (FCFE), which is how much cash flow a business can use if it has zero debt.

While there are many ways to arrive at FCFF, the following is one way to calculate it:

Step 1

Start with Net Operating Profit (NOPAT), which is determined by Earnings Before Interest and Taxes x (1 – Tax Rate)

Step 2

Add Depreciation and Amortization expenses to NOPAT

Step 3

Remove Capital Expenditures

Step 4

Remove Modifications in Net Working Capital

Further Considerations of FCFF Versus FCFE

FCFF assumes there are no payments for interest; nor have any changes in debt been factored in the company’s financial statements. FCFE factors in interest payments and any applicable changes in debt the company may have taken or paid off during the particular accounting time frame. FCFE provides analysts with the ability to determine how efficient a company is and how well (or not) it is at producing cash for equity holders.

Defining NOPAT

NOPAT is a way to see what the company’s operations produce, assuming it has no debt and, accordingly, no outstanding interest expense obligations. It gives analysts and investors an opportunity to look at potential investments with a standardized metric because companies can be seen as having debt and not having debt. It provides easier ability to see if companies can obtain and/or manage debt levels, along with other financial metrics used by investors and analysts.

Along with the already established formula to calculate NOPAT, there’s an alternate formula:

(Net Income + Tax + Interest Expense + Any Non-Operating Gains/Losses] x (1 – Tax Rate)

Operating Earnings = the company’s profits pre interest and taxes (or what the company would earn if it had zero debt, and therefore zero interest expense).

Putting NOPAT in Context

Other important considerations for NOPAT are that it excludes changes in accounts receivable, inventory, accounts payable, and inventory. Additionally, it excludes capital expenditures but accounts for amortization and depreciation.

How NOPAT Assists Analysts and Investors

Businesses can use this data to see how this metric drills down on the business’s core functions. It’s a way to determine how profitable or not a business’ core functions are over shorter and longer time frames. It helps businesses determine how efficient a company is against its competitors since it removes debt and tax comparisons.

Analysis is easier for both businesses looking for acquisitions and for investors. NOPAT helps investors determine which companies are most efficient within their sector based on their main functions. It helps remove the “noise” of debt levels and tax situations.

Looking at these two metrics at face value can seem daunting, but after breaking them down and understanding the differences, it’s easier to see how they aid in financial analysis.